goes on and on. hello, everyone, i am judge jeanine pirro. thank you so much for joining us, it s 5:00 p.m. in new york city, and this is the five. it s in historic day in thetu nations capital is tens of thousands are showing solidarity at the march for israel andit washington dc. it is ia breath of fresh air after a month of anti-somatic threats an d pro-hamas lunacy in the wake of the terror attacks. lawmakers, celebrities, and ordinary americans banding together, calling for the releasns e of hostages and denouncing the growing wave of anti-semitism. we stand with israel. [cheers] [cheers] the calls for cease-fire are outrageous. hamas wants to li wipe off the e of the earth the country of israel and let me be clear that we will never let that happen.sw but that massive show support is at odds with the joe biden state department. an internal memo signed by 100 state department employees accuses president joe biden ofin spreading misinformation about isra
impact your memo would have on parents exercising their constitutional rights? why would you ever release a memo? did you write that memo? did staff write that memo? what would have led you to do this? it is so over the top. your directive is shameful. thank god you aren t on the supreme court. you should resign in disgrace, judge. harris: there is senator cotton of arkansas reminding everybody it was obama s pick for the u.s. supreme court. then mitch mcconnell said i won t put it up for a vote. senator kennedy, is it just garland, is it just the d.o.j., is it the white house, is it a further who is against parents right now in this administration? or something else? i walked away from the hearing thinking forget mars, we need to look for intelligent life in washington, d.c.
as that argument ended. absolutely. now, one thing that i came out of that hearing thinking is don t sit next to this judge across from the judge at a poker table because he didn t let anything on. he went through the entire hearing basically peppering both sides, giving incisive questions, and then he called for that brief recess and he had that opinion ready. he he knew when he was he had carefully considered both sides of it, and it was reflected in his questions. he hit all the points and he raised all of the issues that both of the sides had said, but his continue was withering and it echoed a lot of the language that judge metadid in the d.c. case, basically saying there was no serious argument, that it may be a serious thing that congress is investigating the president as a control questional understanding of it but there was no serious legal argument raised. congressman, monday s case is already going to an expedited
and hopefully, they come to their senses and start cooperating and producing documents and other testimony in other matters, as well. adam, today s judge echoed monday s judge saying there was no serious question, that s the phrase they used. no serious question was raise the by the trump side. right. and what that meant to him since he had the case for three weeks and able to study it, he was ready to issue an opinion unless he heard something from the trump lawyers that he didn t know about. which is why he questioned them very closely. absolutely. questioned the house of representatives lawyers very, very closely. but he was ready to go as soon as that argument ended. absolutely. now, one thing that i came out of that hearing thinking is don t sit next to this judge across from the judge at a poker table because he didn t let anything on. he went through the entire hearing basically peppering both sides, giving incisive
flynn saying he lied to the fbi, knew it was a crime and took full responsibility for it today. but that s not what the white house entered for that hearing thinking was going to happen. they thought that judge was going to be much more critical of the way the fbi interviewed mike flynn. but instead he told the president s former national security adviser he believed he had sold out the country. in the first white house briefing in weeks the trump administration was on the defense. after a wild two-hour sentencing hearing for fired national security adviser, michael flynn resulted in him taking a federal judge up on his offer to delay the sentencing until he cooperates his investigation with the prosecutors. the delay is something between general flynn and the courts. in the meantime, we wish general flynn well. reporter: when reporters raised questions about the president s morning tweet wishing flynn good luck in court, sanders said she saw no