actually all that inclusive. they are not all that welcoming. and they don t really stand with the immigrants and refugees and now they want them gone. take a look. the difficult challenges are, we have, at some point in time they have to move somewhere else. sfliet we cannot we don t have the services to take care of 50 immigrants, and we certainly don t have housing. we re in a housing crisis as we are on the island. so we don t we can t house everyone here that lives here and works here. we don t have housing for 50 more people. sean: for years i ve always said liberals are generous with other people s money. in this particular case, they re all, let s see, pro immigrant in sanctuary cities but not their city. they have to move from here to somewhere else. they can t be here. only 50 people. remember, arizona, texas, they re dealing with mis. they don t have space for 50 migrants, not in any of the beautiful homes in edgar town, not in any of the palatial beach fro
Thought about todays hearing as it relates to cdc, it is this. With the recent incidents, we recognize the pattern at cdc where we need to greatly improve the culture of safety and i am overseeing sweeping measures to improve that culture of safety. Cdc works 24 7 and our scientists protect americans from threats, including naturally occurring threats like ebola and mers and drug resistant bacteria such as anthrax. But we must do that work more safely and we will. Theres a recap of the recent incidents that summarized in our report which has been completed and were just at the outset of our investigation of the influenza contamination. Id be pleased to go through the two diagrams weve provided to the subcommittee which outlined what we know to date. But in brief, the anthrax incident shows deeply troubling problems. A lack of proper protocol, incorrect inactivation procedures. Failure to ensure that we were transferring materials that were sterile when we thought they were sterile. Use
Factual in Bankruptcy Court . Senator boxer excuse me senator mccaskill, im not aware of our position on that in Bankruptcy Court but i can tell you that is associated with probably Attorney Client issues that are present in that proceeding and on that basis, theyve probably taken that position. But im not familiar with the situation youre talking about in Bankruptcy Court on that issue. Who would be . Thats obviously an important legal decision that has been made by your company, and youre the lawyer in charge. This is obviously i dont know that you can have any more high profile litigation than the bankruptcy proceedings right now as to what did and didnt happen as it refers to representations made. If you dont know, who would know . Senator, im familiar with that particular piece of litigation, and i have been working with lawyers to argue on the claims that need to be made and deal with the loss claims on that part of the litigation. You understand its a big one. Ill be happy to ge
Political participation as two of his principles while at the same time the president has kept afghanistans first lady hidden from the eyes of the world for the most part. Do you think he fears that its going to ignite the same protests and reactions from the tribal leaders in the conservative sections of the society . I will answer in the following way. The best solution would have been if the afghans could have solved this themselves. Clear in his immigration speech in 2009, karzai said i want to organize the process. That was after the interference trying to unseat him at the time. Now that didnt work. That didnt work and, therefore, i believe that the visit by john kerry. I admire and respect the fact that he went there, sat down and came to what for me is im going to say the only obvious solution when it comes to the counting. If you disagree on how much to count, count it all, huh . But kerrys handson diplomacy in this respect is admirable. I think its admirable. In 2009 when he
That unless, quote, an agency has adopted a general policy thats so extreme as to amount to an abdomen occasion of its statutory responsibilities. Neither are regulatory delays implementing the employer mandate an affront to the constitution. I think we should take a look at the text of the take care clause. Particularly, the words faithfully and even more striking phrase, take care. The framers could have prescribed simply that the president execute the laws and the legislative history of the constitution shows that they deliberately chose not to do this. Why did they add the words faithfully and especially take care . Defining the president s obligation in this fashion seems to me incorporates that the concept that the president s duty is to execute laws in good faith and to exercise reasonable care in doing so. Scholars concur that this phrasing is that exercise judgment and handle his enforcement duties with fidelity to all laws and the entire law that hes enforcing, the entire aca