President trump in the atlantic story. If you are a supporter of joe biden, we want to hear from you at 202 7488000. If you are a supporter of President Trump, we want to hear from you at 202 7488002 202 7488001. If you are undecided or supporting another candidate, we want to hear from you at 202 7488002. Ofyou are a retired member the military, i really want to hear from you this morning. 202 7488003. You can also text us your 202 7488003. Story talking about the that came out in the atlantic magazine yesterday, which has been the talk of the election so far. I will give you some context on what we are talking about. Trump rejected the idea of the visit because he feared his hair would be disheveled in the rain and because he did not believe it important to honor american war dead. According to four people, in a conversation with senior Staff Members on the morning of the scheduled visit, trump said why should i go to that cemetery, it is full of losers . More thanrred to the 1800 ma
Perhaps you cant see that some of the symptoms are fever or and muscle pains. The bleeding comes very late. The red eyes and extreme weakness. It comes very late in the disease. Early on its problem to differentiate ebola from other more common infectious and sometimes nonInfectious Diseases. This is also a sign you see everywhere not only in sierra leone but other parts of west africa where the viruses. The statement is ebola is real, its not political. Lets fight against ebola. This is the jewelers organization. You see them hospitals and clinics and buildings on the streets in airport so theres initially a perception that ebola is not real and sometimes its not a virus that causes a contagious Infectious Disease and rapid death. From yesterdays w. H. O. World Health Organization update on the number of people with common to think this is a minimum estimate people at ebola. What i want to emphasize is that the top liberia summer than 3000 in guinea this more than 1000. In seminole th
Demonstrating technologies in transparent manners. So that means in some sort of public manner, whether its through the work of the National Labs. We have the work of National Labs across the country that are part of the department of energy. Whether its through public, private partnerships and many of which are referenced and surveyed in the study or through academic work, but in order for policymakers to rely on science and Technology Demonstration in policy making, that work is going to have to be done in a transparent manner that the public can have confidence in. I think you will see quite a few of the recommendations in the study have that in mind and we very much look forward in identifying ways that the department of energy can be part of that continued resource and that demonstration. The many will ask why the arctic, why now outside of this leadership imperative when we have such a tremendous abundance of domestic oil and gas in the lower 48, and the simple answer to that que
Multiagency strategy for understanding and working to develop the science to mitigate the impacts of Unconventional Oil and natural Gas Production and this is with our office and usgs and epa and like wise you see the l recommendations that are pointed to doe. And this report really points back to that role for the arctic as well. In one way the way i think about the work of our office is were the office of science for federal and state regular lay to rs. We were in alaska last week and i can tell you state regulators in alaska are very much focused on these questions and understanding what the science says in an unbiased and neutral manner about this activity can proceed. And those are the same questions that our partners are asking at other federal agencies, and were the the office that they turned to understand what the center of the science understands. And its a vital role that Government Research plays and providing policymakers with an unbiased view of science, technology, and i
In order to ensure that Public Confidence were going to have to make sure that we are conducting science in demonstrating technologies in transparent manners. So that means in some sort of public manner, whether its through the work of the National Labs. We have the work of National Labs across the country that are part of the department of energy. Whether its through public, private partnerships and many of which are referenced and surveyed in the study or through academic work, but in order for policymakers to rely on science and Technology Demonstration in policy making, that work is going to have to be done in a transparent manner that the public can have confidence in. I think you will see quite a few of the recommendations in the study have that in mind and we very much look forward in identifying ways that the department of energy can be part of that continued resource and that demonstration. The many will ask why the arctic, why now outside of this leadership imperative when we