Somebody really caught in the middle of it, and that doesnt excuse the person from the consequences. Professors, weve talked about abuse of power and bribery. When we started, we said we would also discuss Obstruction Of Congress. So id like to ask you some questions about Obstruction Of Congress. Professor gerhardt, in your view, is there enough evidence here to charge President Trump with the high crime and misdemeanor of Obstruction Of Congress . I think theres more than enough. As i mention in my statement, just to really underscore this, the third article of impeachment approved by the House Judiciary Committee against president nixon charged him with misconduct because he failed to comply with four legislative subpoenas. Here it is far more than four that this president has failed to comply with and hes ordered
the Executive Branch as well not to cooperate the congress. Those together with a lot of other evidence suggests Obstruction Of Congress. Professor karlan, do you agree .
about it. we said nothing about the aid being held up. morrison, who contradicted vindman and others, we re not going to do that. there s still evidence being withheld by adam schiff that has not come to this committee and we still haven t fgotten any of the underlying stuff. one being the very important part is the inspector general. his testimony is still being held and there s a quote secret on it or they re holding it in classification. we have plenty of places in this building and other buildings to handle classified information if they still want to do that. anybody in the media, anybody watching today, the first 45 minutes we went through have painted a very interesting