Second, they may be inhibiting their ability to explore world markets. And i dont care what country you are, even if the Global Economy is bigger than you are. Dont cut yourself off from access to it. The same message needs to get to the european who is are struggling with a Single Market which at the same time may be accidentally preventing themselves from participating in a Global Market and letting the Global Market participate in the european one. So my message has always been economic. It is in your interests, mr. President , to invest in the internet, to keep it as open as possible and to allow your creative population to make use of it. No country has a corner on creativity and invention. Its uniformly distributed throughout the population of the world. Its just that the people with these ideas dont always have the wherewithall and support in order to explore those ideas. I will give you as a concrete example of that, how many folks come from india to the Silicon Valley or seatt
Have the legal basis to enforce your Net Neutrality preferences. And so i think wheeler had three possibilities. One, do nothing, in which case the Net Neutrality notions to the extent that people agree they are helpful and useful and preserve user choice would simply not succeed because of the lack of legal basis for fccs enforcement. The second possibility would have been to get the congress to create a new title in the Telecommunications Act specific to internet. Some of you will remember there was a brand x decision, this is the cable the Cable Companies and the Telephone Companies were saying were not regulated the same way. This is correct. There are two different titles in the telecom act for dealing with the entities and they were both providing Internet Service and the complaint was they are providing it under Different Ground rules and this isnt fair. And the question was what to do. The question was to get the congress to adopt an internet title appropriate to the internet t