centre of rafah for the first time. the hamas run health authority says at least 21 people were killed on tuesday in west rafah after an explosion in the same deemed saferfor palestinians, coming safer for palestinians, coming two saferfor palestinians, coming two days after israeli bomb swept through a fire in a refugee camp in rafah leaving 45 people dead including women and children. lucy williamson has more on the fallout. there has been no evacuation order from the israeli army. and for many, no sense of where to this is not a lie. this is not a lie. they were packing up, too, in the displacement camp at tal al sultan to the west of the city, still scarred by fires triggered in an israeli air strike on sunday. dozens dead, survivors spent. there s more than one way to lose a life. israel says its operation in rafah is key to defeating hamas and that the strike on sunday on hamas commanders in the camp was carried out with precise munitions that would not, by themselves,
where novak djokovic has begun his french open title defence with a solid straight sets victory over france s pierre hugues herbert. having not yet reached a final in 2024, there have been question marks around his form. but he did what he does best on the clay courts of the french capital, powering to a 6 4, 7 6, 6 4 win over his wild card opponent. the 24 time grand slam champion will take sole ownership of the record of most major titles with a fourth victory in paris. next up for him spain s world number 63, roberto carballes baena. two time french open finalist casper ruud moved into the second round with a routine 6 3, 6 4, 6 3 win over brazil s felipe meligeni alves. the norwegian is a two time beaten finalist in paris, so will be looking to make that final step. aryna sabalenka meanwhile dropped just three games against teenager erika andreeva to start her french open campaign in emphatic style. the second seed was never truly troubled in a 6 1, 6 2 win over her 19
there is and 60,000 songs every day released on spotify blew my mind, and he said he felt it was inevitable that there would be some crossover. how easy is it to differentiate when is plagiarism and when is not? when is not? well, that s the thing. the oke is when is not? well, that s the thing. the joke is because when is not? well, that s the thing. the joke is because of when is not? well, that s the thing. the joke is because of that - the joke is because of that blurred lines case, there is no great line as to when something crosses from real work to infringement. the legal term of artists, that s very subjective. in the challenge, you ll get dueling experts which often i am one, which will pontificate about this is similar, this is not, but it ends up in the hands of thejury, who are not trained to look at this from a music or legal standpoint, but rather the way they feel. so these cases often times go a way