The negotiators of the tory party, but they think and have seen and a very good evening. For the fourth time in the space believe that the labour party is a of five years, the future of the United Kingdom is uncertain, remain party. The fact of the matter is that they are not going to and this time, with politics in deadlock and brexit unresolved, tolerate that. They believe that in the stakes are higher than ever. Now, in a few moments, 2016, when they had their vote in polling stations across the United Kingdom will close, the voting will be over, the Eu Referendum, they believe that and we will be able to reveal the result of our exit poll, they should have been listened to, that is our first hint of the possible result. And they think that the labour party have totally reneged on the result will Boris Johnson be back in number 10 . Of that. Thats what this is about. WillJeremy Corbyn beat him to it . Or will the outcome be less this was a brexit election. This is than clear when it
The decision of a coward, unwilling to listen to parents of the babies she murdered giving the most emotional and moving testimony that you will ever hear. Its far from the first case of its kind either. In the past 18 months, the killers of sabina nessa, zara aleena, and Olivia Pratt Korbell have all failed to attened sentencing. That is just in the past year. So, 08085 909693 do we need to force the guilty to face court . What can we do when an offender doesnt want to come to the courtroom . Particularly if theyre likely to be disruptive if they do attend . Streaming the proceedings to their cell has been mentioned. Do we go the american way, bring them forcibly into court . Its more than a year since rishi sunak, when he was running for tory leader, first promised to change the law on this. Yesterday he said letby was cowardly for refusing to face sentencing. The labour leader, sir keir starmer, has promised to close what he called the Shamefully Exploited Loophole if elected. Youll
wanted to do something different though not normally be referred back to see if we could calculate what that would do, if the minister propose something that would be calculated or modelled to push the r number above, that would not likely be taken forward so you will underpinned by science and cautioned by it and how far you could go. but science was by it and how far you could go. but science was not the be all and end all of the governmental approach? tt was dominant. but i do not think you can take decisions in a situation without being aware of other factors. ~ . , , factors. what we see here in this exchanue factors. what we see here in this exchange is factors. what we see here in this exchange is that factors. what we see here in this exchange is that there factors. what we see here in this exchange is that there is - factors. what we see here in this exchange is that there is a - factors. what we see here in this i exchange is that there is a decision to go t
aide resigned to support a more hardline proposal. lee anderson and brendan clarke smith said they wanted to strengthen the legislation proposed by the government to send some asylum seekers to rwanda. theyjoined a group of rebel mps in voting for amendments in the commons 60 tories backed the first of these, making it the biggest rebellion mr sunak has suffered since becoming prime minister. our political editor, chris mason, is in westminster for us now. how much trouble is rishi sunak s policy in? the depth and breadth of conservative armies at rishi sunak s plan was there for all to see. for nearly two years the government under three prime ministers has tried to get this idea of sending some asylum seekers to rwanda off the ground and they have failed. stymied in the courts and they are trying again. but there is a significant chunk of conservative mps who think this third attempt will be a dud, too. ministers hope that doesn t necessarily mean come tomorrow they ll re