between rooting for somebody and controlling the turnstile that decides who will get on court they controls the fundings and actually want to get on the court, we are working now with the judiciary himself to try to clean up the mess of that same anonymous money appearing before the court grew phony front groups that file amicus briefs and little flotilla s. or if it s an important enough case, and entire armada of dark money funded front groups. so that bears not at all on this nominee, but because this is a very public form and we heard all about so-called hammering of dark money groups, i wanted to make sure it that it was clear to everyone how this game is played and what the differences.
0 christianity, judaism, islam, embraces traditional definition of marriage, correct? i am aware that there are various religious faiths that define marriage in a traditional way. do you see that when the supreme court makes a dramatic pronouncement about the invalidity of state marriage laws, that it will inevitably sit in conflict between those who ascribe to the supreme court s edict and those who have a firmly held religious belief that marriage is between a man and a woman? woman? well, senator, these issues are being litigated, as you know, throughout the courts as people raise issues. i am limited with what i can say about them. i m aware there are cases i m not asking you to decide a case or predict how you would decide to, i m just asking isn t it apparent that when the supreme court decides that something that is not even in the constitution is a fundamental right, and no state can pass any law that conflicts with the supreme court s edict, particularly in an area w