the crime and her former boss knox, has been for years in prison for the murder wrongly of work conviction was overturned. the slander charge, though remained today, she was sentenced to three years in prison for that crime, but she will not be going back to serve any of it because of the four-year she already served. thanks so much to all of you for being with us. anderson starts now tonight, on 360 big legal breaks for the former president, two of his three remaining trials get pushed back further one indefinitely. also tonight, why trump s about to lose the privilege of karen, the guns he s had a permit to carry for years. and later, marking 80 years since the d-day invasion with some of the last surviving veterans of the operation that turned the tide of world war ii. good evening. thanks for joining us and how difference in ideas from just a few days ago when a new york jury convicted the former president on 34 felony counts. six days later, other than all charges
just sit in there like a big, juicy happening now, breaking news the election subversion case against donald trump in georgia was just put on hold indefinitely. the state appeals court ordering the pause until it rules on the latest effort to get district attorney fani willis disqualified from the case also tonight, trump is renewing is threat to seek revenge for his criminal convic york, the former president turned felons, suggesting he may prosecute and even j hill his political opponents, if he returns to the white house, plus resident biden lands and france just ahead of the d-day anniversary, amy, to show global leadership and draw a stark contrast with trump, will the president s message gets through as the white house is rushing to dispute a new report about his mental fitness welcome to our viewers here in the united states and around the world. i will blitzer a year in this situation room the. skis, cnn breaking news first up tonight, the breaking news, donald trum
she is conducted this case is wildly totally crazily unusual. and the allowing of outsiders to participate in a de and a half hearing that most judges would decide on briefs or may let me give ten minutes aside to argue is just a another illustration that she is trying to kill this prosecution. that s the only conclusion you can draw. no other judge in the federal system that i m aware of would treat these issues anything like what she s trying to do, judge gertner, i mean, you ve been critical of judge cannon s handling this case quite some time. what do you make of her opening up the debate over jack smith s authority to some of trump s outside allies well, let s step back. what she s effectively doing is taking a number of the only way to describe them or maga, arguments, arguments about selective vindictive prosecution in this case arguments about the special
arguments around the constitutionality of the special counsel s office, the office of the department that is prosecuting donald trump in this case. there are judges across the country have looked at those sorts of challenges. in other special counsel criminal cases, and they ve waved them away very quickly. again, not judge cannon. she wants to have a de and a half hearing, and she also wants to hear from third parties. another really unusual thing, there is just so much to work through not just with that as that cohen was just just noting about georgia no trial date on the schedule there. and there is also not a trial date at this time on the calendar, and it is looking every week more and more unlikely, even impossible for the florida classified documents case against donald trump to go to trial in any months soon? is definitely not before the election because there is just so much the judge cannon still has to do lots of legal wins for the trump legal defense
my belief they accepted the testimony of bruce caster. when i look at the facts, keep in mind i was there during the day and a half hearing where we had bruce caster on the stand where he testified as to this alleged promise. the things that he stated were contrary to what a lot of the other evidence. for example, he testified that he had informed cosby s attorney as well as ms. constand s attorneys that he was making this promise. ms. constand s attorneys took the stand and said these promises were never made, in fact, they had no knowledge of it. number two he released a press release moments after declining charges stating that he would revisit the decision to decline charges should the need arise. an individual that makes a promise that he s not going to prosecute someone does not make that kind of press release. i understand the press release was seen as something different