One sort of other related question because we sort of are talking about immigrant as ingredients and sometimes they are refugees and theres a moral imperative involved and like Michael Simmons that bringing migrants its a better form of aid, giving people wages that couldnt happen in their countries. In that sense its a literal substitute for foreign aid. You take the best and brightest out of the other countries and keep them in the United States and what does that leaf them back home . Thats a counter development. After more than ten years their remit answers died by that point and they have less recipients at home. What about the brain drain . That seems to be a negative for foreign development. Sure, theres been study western europe and eastern europe. Theres also the return migration and people do bring skills on the countries. They have trade connections. Also, theres no doubt that what youre saying is the case, that this is by far the biggest source of foreign aid that we have.
To have been tested, the only way to get into north korea, and we do every day, short wave radio. We do a very good job at that so it wouldnt abandon a short wave radio just because its the only way to get into a place like north korea. We recognize there are parts of the world where and nextgeneration media is critical but other parts of the world where its not. Host john lansing can you be critical of u. S. The u. S. Government in your workforce . Guest i think critical reporting his professional journalism and it requires any reporter to ask questions whether it be the federal government or many other foreign governments or any other policy. Thats on both sides of the aisle. When the iran deal is being carried we carried it live and carried it on both sides. Thats really our mission is to tell americas story, every side of it. Host john lansing is the new ceo of the broadcasting board of governors which includes voice of america, Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty and radio saw a, radi
Put another level of protection there. I want you to do to hops until theres a connection. We are not authorized now to follow the string as we used to be able to do. In terms of the metadata of those are probably the biggest changes we have dealt with. In addition we have provided broad guidance in the form of an unclassified document that the government has generated which in a very public unclassified way outlines the general principles we want to make sure we apply in conducting intelligence at the nsa so we are putting those principles in place. In addition we have completed over the course of the last 15 months or so a fundamental review of everything that nsa does and what we collect against. That has all been reviewed to ensure we are comfortable from a policy perspective and what we are doing. Basically what the admiral said is in erbil her bill that the senate unfortunately did not take up. We look forward to putting it together. As quickly and this is so important. There was
Weve already been directed to use that model. We now have to go to the court to access the data. Is the government no longer collecting located . The data continues to be provided to us. Now to access the data we have to go to the court to get permission to access the data. Why continue to gather the data is both administration and the and i dont think this is the best approach to . Guess im confused because i dont think ive heard the president or the di said access to the data is not a value. I think what ive heard is the question gets to be who should hold the data it the president directed in his remarks will continue to implement the program right now while Congress Works to how well make longterm changes. We will do that on a 90 day interval. So every 90 days we have to go back and ask for continued permission. One last comment. I know amount of time. If the administration believes, and understand that they do, that the better model is to go to a paradigm where Companies Hold onto
Quorum call quorum call quorum call s mr. Chambliss mr. President , i ask that the quorum call be dispensed with and i be allowed to speak in morning business. The presiding officer without objection. Mr. President , i rise today along with my colleague from New Hampshire s been very focused, as havere i, on this issue of the release of detainees from guantanamo and the fact that we know that not only are there dangerous individuals there that should not be released, but we also know that these individuals are returning to the fight and theyre scheming, planning and intending to do harm to america and americans. So i want to visit this issue again and i want to start off just by saying that its well founded in our nations history that the United States has the authority to hold enemy combatants until the end of hostilities in order to prevent their return to the battlefield. For the past several years, each National Defense authorization act that has been signed into the law by the pre