Stay updated with breaking news from Gt question. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
That if the case starts to fall apart before trial then guess what prosecutor has the authority and the ability to dismiss chargeses dismiss cases and they re one who is really call shot even more so than judge. pre-trial and this case, obviously, this prosecutor was on a quest to convict that is not what our system is based on. that s not what it is suppose to be. you know when a jury comes back with a verdict they have two choices. one can be guilty other could be not guilty. if they come back with a guilty verdict it doesn t mean this is broken justice is not a contest to be one or a loss. this prosecutor as i said before was a real piece of work and for whatever reason, he just kept this case going when it was flailing from the start. well francy listening to that do you think they have a personal bias against rittenhouse? that s great question i hope not as a former state and former prosecutor i don t like to think that. ....
The week washington examiner which is a centrist media outlet they have an tim carney who wrote it but he said i guarantee if you took a poll of democrats out there liberals and asked them that question, people involved in this rittenhouse shooting they race majority of liberals that were 30% and good swath would say they were black but glenn we see this all of the time i did a piece of my podcast earlier this week about how liberals still believe you know that hospitalization rates if from coronavirus is 50% how they believe thousands of unarm black men are shot every year by police officers. i mean glenn, these are opinions. these are facts that are wrong not an opinion like what diewpght to keep your temperature of your house at and lots of liberals just consistently get wrong. yeah. you know mayor of new york bill de blasio after the verdicts was released went on to twitter and posted this statement saying how ....
They make because they re ones are front row seat to evidence and not angry mob outside. finally we have this how did the prosecution mess up the gun charge so badly? watch this from the judge real quick. not a shotgun yes. number six dismissed. how does that happen i don t know lisa that s a great question like they said they have charged this case within 48 hour it is of the distinct. they couldn t possibly have had all of the evidence and definitely didn t have all of the video evidence they were bowing to howling mob justice. and it boggles my mind that wisconsin prosecutors didn t seem to understand wisconsin laws about the barrel or the overall length of a gun. this is prosecution 101 stuff. and it sounds luke they just piled on in the geng and never wanted to walk it back because they themselves were afraid of ....
Duration of this trial this is a very serious matter. yeah so why wasn t jury sequestered? you you know lisa that s a gt question the judge should have questered jury at least for deliberations judges don t like to make juries mad because judges around country generally are elected. and it is those jurors that are going to go home to friends and family to talk about how judge treated them and a sequestered jury is an angry jury. and i think this judge just did not want an angry jury. but it looks like it could have been a huge mistalk clearly it was not. jury reached right verdict but it could have been a huge mistake when you have protesters outside of the courthouse reporters following the van, judge is getting death threats, and e i guarantee they wengts home to families and they heard about everyone outside of the courthouse all of the threats about the jurors having their photograph taken. i don t know how this jury had ....
Was not one of those plastic tabs preventing the prosecutor from putting their finger on trigger so i don t have any qlad they were thinking. it is almost like they were trying to lose but i don t think so. because they made so many mistakes that they thought were going to be in their favor and actually worked out other way. i think preem watching why did this ever go to trial to again with. great question and in the only going to trial but indicted in record time. and i think that another result of the prosecution in this case really to the court of public opinion and as you know the court of public opinion has no place in a court of law. we all know if you pay attention to trial you know that fact week you know that prosecution was a piece of work but lisa i think there s something bigger gong on here. i think if you listen to maniac on social media and in the media, there s a fundamental ....