Katy Tur hosts coverage of national and international news, including breaking stories. Thats right, katy. You know, the president tweeted sunday in response to our article that he is not worried about don jr. , but people who have been talking to him on the phone say in fact he is worried about his son. He is worried about a lot of aspects related to this russia probe, which is getting closer and closer to him, to his family, to his associates, to his orbit. Its uncomfortable at the moment. There is some concern that he has that his son may be found to have violated the law somehow, you know. One person speculated maybe his son could have perjured himself in interviews at some point. I mean, the president just doesnt know at this point what could be in store for his son. It is a source of concern and its one of many things thats fueling what were seeing, which is a real public lashing by the president of mueller again and again and again, tweeting more than he has before about the wit
else, you stretch the elastic, and then the next person stretches the elastic more and more, so we ve gotten more. this guy like no one else, the executive branch, the right? you re not surprised about this executive power has become development, right, that he may be shying away from public greatly expanded. and candidly, jim, congress has testimony. frankly, he could have come forward and spoken on the record sort of let it happen. it was definitely true in first at any time during the two years of obama s presidency. it was definitely true in first investigation. if you remember the three two years of trump s presidency, times that someone did speak publicly on behalf of the special counsel s office, it was where they had congresses of their party and those congresses never mueller. during the ira and gru broadly acquiesce to them, i think particularly in trump s indictment press conferences, it case, somewhat out of fear for was both times rod rosenstein political consequences. a
assist. in addition, they added any efforts to obstruct as an original matter. am i this is a factual question i m e going to ask and i m because i have so many things in my head. did anyone ever get charged with the podesta hack? was it both or is that it i believe the podesta hack is incorporated in the gru indictment and my apologies to anyone who knows that that s incorrect, but i believe that s correct. the process goes through william barr. we know that the deputy national finance chair was raided, we
assist that interference. in addition they added to that any efforts to obstruct the investigation as an original matter. this is a factual question that i m going to ask and because i have so many things in my head. did anyone ever get charged with the podesta hack? was it both of those hacks or is that hangout there? i believe and someone s going to tweet at me i m wrong about this. but i believe the podesta hack is incorporated in the gru indictment. and apologies to anyone who knows but that s incorrect. but i believe that s correct. so frank, the process now goes through william barr. i wonder what you think the folks in say the southern district of new york who still have what we believe to be and a live investigation.
any efforts to obstruct the investigation as an original matter. this is a factual question that i m going to ask and because i have so many things in my head. did anyone ever get charged with the podesta hack? was it both of those hacks or is that hangout there? i believe and someone s going to tweet at me i m wrong about this. but i believe the podesta hack is incorporated in the gru indictment. and apologies to anyone who knows but that s incorrect. but i believe that s correct. so frank, the process now goes through william barr. i wonder what you think the folks in say the southern district of new york who still have what we believe to be and a live investigation. we know others have been talked