Under taliban control. We Human Rights violations in areas under taliban control. Under taliban control. We have received credible under taliban control. We have received credible reports under taliban control. We have received credible reports of received credible reports of violations received credible reports of violations of received credible reports of violations of International L received credible reports of. Violations of International Law received credible reports of violations of International Law and human violations of International Law and Human Rights violations of International Law and Human Rights abuses violations of International Law and Human Rights abuses taking violations of International Law and Human Rights abuses taking place| violations of International Law and. Human rights abuses taking place in areas Human Rights abuses taking place in areas under Human Rights abuses taking place in areas under effective Human Rights abuses taking place in areas under effect
Even falsely blame the fbi. All this after 21 republicans voted against awarding congressional medals to the ives who defended their lives. Reporter newly released footage somehow an upclose look at what officers went through during the January 6th attack. These new videos revealed after Cnn And Other Media outlets sued for them in court, showing scott fairland, a Gym Owner from new jersey, taunting, then shoving an officer, and punching him in the face. Another video, taken from an officers body cam, showing thomas webster, a former marine and Retired Nypd officer seen here, wearing a red coat, threatening police with a flagpole before tackling one officer to the ground. Both men have pleaded not guilty to all charges. Its a Rude Awakening for everyone, but hopefully it will also help people see the lies of the former president. Its shameful, but sadly theres an awful number of my republican colleagues who seem to not field shame. The videos come as some republican members of congress
jonathan haidt, welcome to hardtalk. thank you so much, steve. it is a pleasure to have you here. now, of course, your home base is new york university, across the pond in the united states. right now, that university along with many others in the us is in ferment, with students occupying certain grounds within the university. mm hm. you ve written a lot over many years about the intellectual atmosphere on campus in america, so i want to begin by asking you what you make of these protests. so, of course, the right to protest, we re all in favour of. the key issue for me is intimidation. this is what began in 2015 a change in the nature of campus life, so that people who are making a political point are doing it not with persuasion but with intimidation. and i ve done a lot of writing about how it was the arrival of social media that allowed people to intimidate others, threaten any dissenters with mob reactions. so my previous book, the coddling of the american mind, wa
who are making a political point are doing it not with persuasion but with intimidation. and i ve done a lot of writing about how it was the arrival of social media that allowed people to intimidate others, threaten any dissenters with mob reactions. so my previous book, the coddling of the american mind, was about this strange, new and really kind of frightening morality that came to us right around 2015 it wasn t there in 2013. and so i m starting this way because this is the backstory to what s happening today. yeah, but what you ve already said is important because you have made it clear in the past that you reject the notion that words can be seen as violence. mm hm. and you basically say that, intellectually speaking, we all need to have thicker skins. mm hm. we all need to understand that offence can happen, it can be taken, but it is not akin to violence. that s right. so when you use that word intimidation about a bunch of young people chanting slogans about the