Live Breaking News & Updates on Gregg Supreme Court
Stay updated with breaking news from Gregg supreme court. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
And, there were no fatalities, so, everything that cass damaged can be repaired. heather: elizabeth prann, thanks orjoining us. gregg. president barack obama: the highest court in the land has spoken. we ll continue to implement this law and we ll work together to improve on it where we can. but, what we won t do, what the country can t afford to do, is refight the political battles of two years ago. or go back to the way things were. i disagree with the supreme court s decision and i agree with the dissent. what the court did not do, on its last day in sessio do on my first day, if elected president of the united states. and that is i will act to repeal obamacare. gregg:s you a heard the supreme court s decision to uphold the president s health care law putting a divisive debate front and center and now the polls show the president ....
Leaks, in the health care switch-a-roo, bait and switch, i think it hurts him and people question his character. gregg: congressman among independents, and swing voters. gregg: we re running out of time, i want to get to a couple subjects, the g.o.p. needs a net gain of 4 seats to retake the u.s. senate and is the obamacare decision the central theme in key swing states and let s look at these key senate races, i should say, maine, ohio, florida, virginia, missouri, nebraska, north dakota. basically, gregg all of those states there are actually nine to have them, mirror the presidential race and are basically tied, all of them. and they can be nationalized over health care. and the economy. and, there are four democratic seats and five republican seats. we have to get four to get the 51 to control the senate if we are serious about repealing ....
Would be able to track the use of those vehicles collect the data and then pass that along to marketers and advertisers, does that infringe on the privacy of those car owners? full disclosure, google is client to the firm. but having said that it doesn t change my analysis. there is no reasonable expectation to privacy when it comes to the issue. you have the individuals that purchase the item. they are going to be out on the streets. their names will be known, it has to be on the license. if there is an issue with respect to driving them. there are so many markers. there is no expectation for privacy. gregg: supreme court said she is right there. is no expectation of privacy in public place. there are cameras everywhere. how is this any different than the cameras that follow people? i think it s significantly different. when you talk about the ....
Safari on apple s browser can one really trust google. google has made us immensely knowledgeable in this world. anything you want to know something about, look what they are talking about. health information, federal laws protect information. you are talking about passwords and searches. there is an expectation of privacy in that and who knows what they have done with that information. gregg: doesn t it stop. how do we know they are not going collect the car data now? i don t trust them at all. to mercedes point they have done great things. technology is vast and wonderful. we all google. at the same time we need a measure of protection. let s be clear about this. $38 billion in revenue, 98% of that revenue that google raised from advertising. what do they want this for? they want it to determine what our choices are so they can marketed it. ....
This decision, is the core basically said the congress can t force you to buy something but and penalize you for not being something and that is absurd to me and as people discuss it more and more, as we ll discuss, if it is a tax the tax was never started and the bill has to be started in the house of representatives and, it was not a tax voted on this thing, it was a penalty and there is a whole room to open it up again. gregg: and the court has no jurisdiction until the tax is collected and i m trying to figure that out but i want to throw up a fox news poll that came out on the eve of the decision, amazing. 60% of americans believe it is a violation of individual rights and 36% believe it is acceptable in the constitution and dig deeper, 2/3 of independents think it is bad. could that turn the independents into the red column. look, in 2010, the economy was the biggest issue, health care was the decisive issue and ....