beautiful morning. morning i love it.t. i m back from vacation feelingeg g i hope everyone is feelingsee good as well. as wel you re back from vacation.vat i m back from vacation.acat we ll be overly energized. and when you tune innd when tomorrow, we re going to beoe like meh. it s not too hot, not too humid. humi it s beautiful.eautiful your headline for the daythe d today and the weekend.. whoo-hoo! who lots of weekend sunshine.kenn love it.ove i if you have outdoor plansorls today, tomorrow even monday mony all three days are going to be b fantastic.asti lots of sunshine, no rain inai the forecast. again if you re grillinggr outside father s day tomorrow.ao yes. lots of outdoor grilling, barbecuing, it s going to be a perfect weekend for that. tt. there s your satellite andite an radar. crystal clear skies across the region.re. only threat today is just a few passing clouds from times ft to time.to i ll expand things out. you can see just how is. no ma
with all due respect, yes. okay. and if there is just a question for the city attorney, if there is in terms of, you know, legally if there is a difference of opinion as to whether or not there is an impact, you know, where they re saying that pumping op raytions are being increased and the department is not saying that that s not true, ~ if there is a difference of opinion legally, where does the benefit of the doubt fall? deputy city attorney marla byrnes through the president. i think what you may be getting at, and please clarify if i m not answering the question that you re asking, is what is the project that s being reviewed under environmental review here. and c-e-q-a requires that we look at what the wrote et is as proposed in comparison to what the baseline conditions are. ~ so, this project doesn t propose to change pumping protocols, then the city is not required as lead agency to look at potential changes to pumping protocols. pumping protocols are taken a
arguments or to the position that the department has and i m still not clear on sort of what that means in terms of whether or not the appellant has met their threshold yet. okay. before i go to supervisor mar and kim, i know rec and park was also going to make a presentation. so, let me just ask colleagues, supervisor mar, do you want to ask your questions of planning or do you want to wait for rec and park s presentation? there s one that s relevant to this question of is there substantial evidence. of their argument . wild equity is saying one expert, greg hammond, the hydrologist that worked with the recreation and park department and analyzed the hydrology, according to wild equity, they re saying that he explained that the pumping rate will harm the threatened california red legged frog and the laguna solano wet land complex in two wii ways. one, it will cause harm to the california frog by draining more of the frog s breeding habitat, ~ the cover habitat being impa
an e-i-r is one mechanism through c-e-q-a to perform environmental review. it is required when there are significant impacts that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level. that environmental review was completed for the initial study. thank you. i do think there is a certain circular nature to the arguments or to the position that the department has and i m still not clear on sort of what that means in terms of whether or not the appellant has met their threshold yet. okay. before i go to supervisor mar and kim, i know rec and park was also going to make a presentation. so, let me just ask colleagues, supervisor mar, do you want to ask your questions of planning or do you want to wait for rec and park s presentation? there s one that s relevant to this question of is there substantial evidence. of their argument . wild equity is saying one expert, greg hammond, the hydrologist that worked with the recreation and park department and analyzed the hydrology, ac