debate for kansas governor, republican kris kobach, democrat laura kelly and independent greg or been faced each other in a debate. this is our this is one hour. how the candidates set themselves apart? you re about to find out. governor sthe kansas debate, live from wichita, kansas. ksnt are live from the studios. you can follow the debate on social media using the #ksndeb ate. ksn in wichita, ksnt covering topeka. we are also being seen on ksci the spot. i want to introduce the three candidates tonight. they were invited to participate because they met the criteria. we begin with greg gorman. instarted his first business 1992. that she is married with he is married with two daughters. he has worked as an advisor to president donald trump. he is married and has five daughters. also joining us is laura kelly. she is a state senator elected in 2004. she is married and has two daughters. my colleagues. a political analyst for ksnt tv in topeka. before we begin, let s go ove
helps with voting births at at my church. voighted for donald trump. i ve been voting since 2006 as a democrat. i said no i haven t. this is my first time i ever voted. i m 58 years old. this is the first time my husband voted. i went in with me when i was volunteering. and he had to sign the form to wait 29 days for his card. let me ask you this. let me interrupt you since we re talking to the publishers. okay. if you have a question for the real clear politics staff. where do we need to make sure we have a right card to vote for democrat or republican. my neighbors are voting for trump here. all right. i m not sure they know the specific rules in arizona. i ll throw the we do carl to talk about voting access s that something that you have focused on in your coverage, issues that who goes to the polls? well, yeah. i don t know the specific case. and sounds like she already voted and you get to vote for trump. somebody thinks she s a democrat, maybe a local democratic
find great erin sight into it. no one respected the admiral than i do. he is caught many times between the macinations of congress where we force him to take from critical systems to pay for other critical systems and i think he would like to avoid that conundrum. but our near peer adversaries are near to tackling our space assets. this is no longer academic and the question before this committee is what shall we do about it. these adversaries have taken note of the u.s. space dominance provides our military and observed the defenseless nature of our space assets. if we are to abandon the commanding heights of future battlefields without a fight, it will be our military who suffers the consequences as they find themselves cut off and fighting blind in an environment far from home. china has clearly demonstrated anti-satellite missile capability and proven it could reach from orbit to low earth orbit. russia has also tested a direct assent a sat and north korea and iran have b
they don t provide support at all. the president s own words and actions the president understands precisely the constitutional argument i made when he ran in 2007. he said the president does not have unilateral power to wage war without congress during absent an actual or imminent attack on the united states. of articlee limits ii. limitationsds the of the 2001 ums who said we shouldn t be broadening that a withhat was put together no geographic limitation and no temporal limitation. we should be narrowing it. we should be refining it during we should be ultimately on the path to repeal it. with respect to the 2002 iraq authorization that the administration now claims give support for the mission, just a few months ago, we had a hearing on it. administration witnesses can repair to be asked on it. it the position of the administration that it should be obsolete and now be repealed? i would be i would argue that the residence onwards as a candidate and as a president is h