dors attorney , let s start over. i think what the theory is , is that the federal law says that anything that is made, any expenditure, money that is made for the purpose of influencing an election is therefore a political contribution. and thus president trump had to pay any funds to stormyaudien daniels with campaign funds and reportce them as such.ecutor but the thing is that key phrases for the purpose of influencing an election. but that doesn t mean the subjective intent of the spender or the donor. in other words, if i think that it would be really useful to help president trump win the election, by making a contribution to the national rifle association right. that s not a campaign expenditure. despite my subjective intent or to put it in the candidate s term. if a candidate says i need tha to have a really nice looking ay suit for the debate and he mad spent so much money on a suite he would not normally spend,l that doesn t become a campaign danie expenditure. it s still a p