Grant Cert News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Grant cert. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Grant Cert Today - Breaking & Trending Today
What do they want to hear . Or is it potentially that they just want to be the ones to hear it. The lead on writing a definitive ruling on something as foundational as whether this president , any president , is above the law. But you cant separate that motivation from the timing. Why did it take so long for the justices to decide to hear it . And why will it take so long for them to actually hear it. The court has worked faster before, including on Hearing Arguments regarding the colorado ballot. Again, the timing here matters. Not just for this case, which is now unlikely to be tried before election day, but Donald Trumps other cases as well. The classified documents at maralago, maybe even georgia, if that case ever even gets off the ground. Or the arguments regarding the colorado decision to remove trump from the ballot. Theres so much to consider. The motivation, the p ....
thank you for joining us this evening. it took nearly a month to get it, but we finally have it. the d.c. circuit court of appeals has ruled on presidential immunity. donald trump s last best attempt to evade a criminal trial for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election. in his unanimous ruling written by all three federal appeals court judges overseeing this case two biden appointees and one appointee of president george h.w. bush. those judges spell it out in no uncertain terms a former president cannot be prosecuted is worthless. quoting from the ruling, it would be a striking paradox if the president alone is vested with the constitutional duty to take care the laws be faithfully executed where the sole officer capable of defying those laws with impunity. we cannot accept former president trump s claim that a president has unbounded authority to commit crimes that would neutralize the most fundamental check on executive power in recognition and implementation of e ....
Do you agree that those principles are just as relevant today as they were when the supreme court first decided new york times v. sullivan? new york times v. sullivan is the continuing binding precedent of the supreme court, and it does state the principles that the court has determined are undergirding the first amendment right to free press. okay. and last summer, actually, in lawson, the supreme court declined to review a case in which the 11th circuit applied new york times v. sullivan, justice thomas and justice gorsuch each dissented from the decision not to grant cert, arguing that the court should reconsider its holding in sullivan. how would you approach a case that sought to limit or overturn the central holding in new york times v. sullivan? thank you, senator. ....
Constitutional issue but on the other hand we don t have a circuit split where different courts are deciding the issue differently and if you look at the decisions, they re air tight. i don t they the supreme court will say we need to come in and fix that. i think it was a 68-page opinion, i think it was unanimous across all three it was. their judges. so if the court, if the supreme court did intervene and grant cert and take this up, what would that tell you about a court that john roberts keeping says is not political, is not political, is not political. i have to tell you, poppy, whatever anyone s political leanings are, i do not see a reasoned way under the law that you could come in favor of donald trump in this case. the law and the logic are just so clear. if you look at that 68-page opinion, it was 3-0 in the court appeals, a different judge below ruled the same way. so i think this one is will rise above politics. ....
Works of the committee. so i m here to you know, to say that i think there s a good shot that this is the end of the road for trump. and by the way, it means that the law of the d.c. circuit is this executive privilege claim of his is garbage. and that matters for meadows. it matters for bannon. it matters for anyone else they would consider referring for criminal contempt because they couldn t hide behind a bogus executive privilege claim any longer. yeah. just to be clear, you need four votes, right, of the nine. that s right. to what s called grant cert, for the court to take on the case. the vast majority don t get cert. and the opinion is written to basically try to sort of lay the groundwork and say, hey, you people who hate judicial activism, don t like the bench, you know, putting its nose in the political branch s business, ....