several members in law enforcement impacted your understanding of the law or your approach to your judicial service? thank you, senator. some of my earliest memories in addition to my father at the kitchen table with his law books were of my uncles, two of my uncles were year law enforcement. one was a detective, uniformed detective and one of them was a city of miami police department overs parks troll overs for a long time before he became the chief, and i remember very well we would go to my grandmother s house on sundays and she would make a big dinner for our families and-mile-per-hour uncles would sometimes come off
how, if at all, is having several family members in law enforcement impacted your understanding of the law or your approach to your judicial service? thank you, senator. some of my earliest memories, in addition to my father at the kitchen table with his law books, were of my uncles. two of my uncles were career law enforcement and one was a detective, unformed detective. one was a city of miami police department officer, patrol officer for a long time before he became a chief. and i remember very well we would go to my grandmother s house on sundays and she would make a big dinner for our family and my uncles would sometimes come off of their
0 world at large, and i think it s six months, maybe a year, but that goes on at least on an annual basis, and if these a determination that this person still represents a threat to the united states rp they are continued to be confined. that s the way the system works. are you okay with that? as a policy matter, senator? i m not speaking to my views, that s my understanding is that the periodic review system is an executive branch determination of whether or not they are going to continue to hold people does that make sense to you as a way to deal with these detainees? i m not in a position to speak to the policy or the discretion of the executive branch regarding how they are going to handle detainees. the reason i mention it is because in the brief you argued that the executive brarn doesn t have that option, that if you had had your way, the executive branch could not do periodic reviews about the danger the detainee presents to the united states. they would have to make
0 whether or not they still present a threat to the united states or the world at large and i think it s six months, maybe a year. but that goes on at least on an annual basis, and if there is a determination that this person still represents a threat to the united states, they are continued to be confined. that s the way the system works. are you okay with that? as a policy matter, senator, i m not speaking to my views. my understanding is the periodic review system is an executive branch determination of whether or not they are going to continue to hold people. does that make sense to you as a way to deal with these detainees? senator, i m not in a position to speak to the policy or discretion of the executive branch regarding how they are going to handle detainees. the reason i mention is because in one of the briefs you argued the executive branch doesn t have that option. if you had had your way, the executive branch could not do periodic reviews about the danger the detai