Put what on the president . This idea that you just said the the New York Times is reporting that the president approved either wrote or approved the that is not an outlandish suggesting. I take the the New York Times reporting on its face and why wouldnt a father thats president of the United States want to have a say in what his son was putting out that involves him and his presidency. Seems like a legitimate thing thats why i asked. 39yearold son whose running the Trump Corporation and the trump organization, so he doesnt need to be looked over the shoulder by his father. Heres what i think we need to really focus on and obviously i appreciate you having me on. I need to be clear about three things here. Number one, the president was not aware of the meeting, did not attend the meeting and was only made aware of the emails very recently by counsel and not seen the emails. In fact, you know, i didnt see the email until yesterday and im one of the lawyers. So there you have it. Okay.
i m saying no. i m talking about you asked i don t want to talk about the law. appropriate is not a legal standard. i m the president s lawyers. i understand that. if our culture is only about what you can go to jail for, we got a messed up democracy. it s got to be about doing what is right as well. you just said if the ukrainians did it, it s fine. if the russians did it i did not ever say that. i never said it. what i said was in your view is it okay for the russian chris. is it okay in your view for the ukrainians to give dossier information they got governmentally on then president trump to the dnc and the hillary clinton campaign? is that okay with you? is that okay? one, let s be honest. is it okay? not my call special counsel. two, is it illegally no because i think solicitation is what triggers election law standards. this is not about the law.