has backed up these claims that there have been threats to withdraw things from constituencies. no. four years in the government s with office, and at no point was it appropriate or even possible for a government with two threatened the withdrawal of a government project from somebody s constituency. the commons made today have not been borne by anybody else, this is not something that happens. the prime minister said something that happens. the prime minister said he something that happens. the prime minister said he has something that happens. the prime minister said he has seen something that happens. the prime minister said he has seen no - minister said he has seen no evidence of such tactics, but that s rather different from saying they have not been used. you are saying in your experience, this sort of threat is not made. in your experience, this sort of threat is not made. well, it s not in the power threat is not made. well, it s not in the power of threat is not m
and, of course, somebody could bring a suit like this. but the heart of the legal claim here is that these private companies are not actually acting as private companies. they are acting on behalf of the federal government and they are protected by the federal government in the form of section 230 c 2 when they do it. that s the heart of this argument which is what makes this case different than when normal private companies behave as private companies. ainsley: that s interesting. because they are involved with the government? that would be your argument. exactly. so, there is two prongs to the argument. i have seen trump based on what i saw yesterday they are making one of the prongs pretty strongly and make both prongs strongly if they go to the supreme court. two prongs are is this one is basically i would like to see them argue that they are responding to government threats. congressional democrats and senators have threatened these companies to say that if you don t take down
Ron Paul Warns of Government Crackdown on Bitcoin â The Government Is the Threat
Former congressman Ron Paul has warned of a government crackdown on bitcoin and safe-haven assets may not be safe from government intervention. “The government is the threat,” he said, noting that “they will crack down because they have the ability to do it.”
Ron Paul Warns of Government Threat to Bitcoin
Former presidential candidate Ron Paul shared his view on the government’s intervention on bitcoin in an interview last week with Kitco News’ Michelle Makori. Paul is an American author, physician, and retired politician. The former congressman from Texas launched The Ron Paul Liberty Report in 2015 to bring “provocative opinion and analysis to the breaking issues affecting our lives and finances,” its website describes.
research and development environment that we have, which we all revere. but they re taking advantage of it, so one thing we re trying to do is view the china threat as not just a whole of government threat, but a whole of society threat on their end and i think it will take a whole of society response by us. it is not just the intelligence community, but it is raising awareness within our academic sector, within our private sector as part of the defense. in that vain, last week i wrote a letter to five higher education institutions in florida about the confucius institutes, funded by china, chinese government dollars at u.s. schools and it is my view they re complicit in these efforts to covertly influence public opinion and to teach half truths designed to present chinese history, government or official policy in the most favorable light. do you share concerns about confucius institutes as a tool of that whole of society effort and as a way to exploit the sort of naive view among so