he faced numerous charges the charges were dismissed in 1973 because of government misconduct, including breaking into his doctor s office to try to get other information on him. i spoke with daniel just yesterday. you were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in february. the doctors gave you three to six months to live you decided to speak out i wanted to ask you, how are you feeling? how are you doing? i m having a very good month here without pain. they will give me stuff for the pain eventually. it s turning out that it s good to work under a deadline it turns out, it s good to live under a deadline, too. i m eating things i haven t been able to eat for seven years
media giant of silencing voices on the right. you can consider your speech canceled during my time because you canceled mine. you permanently banned my personal twitter account. you silence me from communicating with the american people over a freaking joke. who the hell do you think that you are? a day after that hot mess, the houses organization weaponization subcommittee has not really hearing to expose of the republican majority calls government misconduct toward conservatives. instead, it felt more like a fox news fever dream filled with conspiracy theories and personal grievances. i want to assure you both that we come not to trash the fbi but to rescue the fbi. from political capture. dozens and dozens of whistleblowers, fbi agents coming to us, talking about
culture and censorship by big tech. while the hearing produced virtually no new evidence of government misconduct or targeting of the right, democrat jamie raskin, succinctly summarized what the republicans appear to be determined to do with this new panel. take a listen. millions of americans already fear that weaponization is the right name for the special subcommittee, not because weaponization of the government is its target, but because weaponization of the government is its purpose. to help us clear up what this new committee is really all about, i am fortunate to be joined this morning by congresswoman jasmine crockett. congresswoman, it is always a pleasure to have you on the show, how do you think democrats can actually use this weaponization subcommittee to investigate real abuses by the government, but under donald trump s reign? it is good to see you this
president donald trump insisted would be revealed. on friday a federal judge threw out one of five charges against the primary source for the dossier. the latest now from cnn s marshal cohen. the trial against the primary source continues monday with closing arguments and likely jury deliberations. this case has been brought by special counsel john durham who for the past 3 1/2 years has been looking for government misconduct in the trump-russia investigation. he hasn t brought many indictments on that front, but he did charge the primary source of the dossier, a russian expat and former think tank analyst named igor. now, durham originally charged him with five counts of lying to the fbi during interviews in 2017 when fbi agents were trying to corroborate that infamous and explosive trump-russia dossier,
The American Bar Association's recently approved requirement that law schools educate students on bias, cross-cultural competency and racism, while a step in the right direction, fails to publicly acknowledge and commit to eradicating the systemic racial inequality in our legal system, says criminal defense attorney Donna Mulvihill Fehrmann.