[sfx: poof] [sfx: squeaking eraser sound effect.] i am who i wanna be who i wanna be who i wanna be. i m a strong individual feeling that power i m so original, ya sing it louder. i am, oooh oooh oooh oooh ehhh ehhh ehhh ehhh i am, oooh oooh oooh oooh i am the way you triumph over adversity. and live your lives. that s why we redesigned humira. we wanted to make the experience better for you. now there s less pain immediately following injection. we ve reduced the size of the needle and removed the citrate buffers. and it has the same effectiveness you know and trust. humira citrate-free is here. a little change can make a big difference. humira can lower your ability to fight infections.
the idea of transgenderrism, or a specific ideology. they said the plaintiff has no not plaintiff acknowledges they gave the option to stop using gender-based titles during class, but plaintiff rejected that option. is that an accurate assessment of the claim? no, not exactly. what happened was professor meriwether indicated that he would be willing to refer to this student with his last name or his first name, and just avoid the use of pronouns, but what the university was requiring was that professor meriwether change the way he addressed the entire class, and that he could not use any pronouns for any other students at all, and he had to not only change the way he addressed to this student, but he change the way he addressed all students. that s exactly wha what the first amendment forbids.
constitution, as justice gorsuch points out, the way to fix that if you don t like it is to amend it. people have been able to amend it 27 times. that s the appropriate method, not life-tenure judges. shannon: he writes about this in his new book, he comes to decisions he doesn t personally agree with because he feels his job is to simply interpret the law as it is written, and there are times he takes on a case and those people will be furious about the outcome, but he says it s not up to him to rewrite the law from the bench. okay, i think elena kagan says we are all originalists now. are there some segments in the academy they don t agree with it, but that his view that you have to interpret the constitution as it was written, i think that is sound and broadly accepted. more so than, say, 30 years ago. it s part of the legacy of his judicial hero, justice alito. shannon: quite an influence on him when you talk about him and that sunday, as well.