there s more money pouring. and here is how much poured into the last three nominations via the judicial crisis network. $21 million related in time to the gorsch nominee. 17 million to the kavanaugh and 16 million to the barrett. could bow the same donor. who knows and we don t know what business may may have had before the court. and i think it matters when someone is seeking to influence the makeup of the court that the public understand what business they may have before the court. and they didn t stop with the trump nominees. they got up on the air a dark
0 of marriage, correct? i am aware there are various religious faiths that define marriage in a traditional way. do you see that when the supreme court makes a dramatic pronouncement about the invalidity about state marriage laws, it will inevitably set in conflict between those who ascribe to the supreme court s edict and those who have a firmly held religious belief that marriage is between a man and a woman? well, senator, these issues are being litigated, as you know, throughout the courts i as people raise issues and so, i m limited in what i can say about them. i m aware there are cases i m not asking you to decide a case or predict how you would decide in the future. i m asking isn t it apparent that when the supreme court decided something that is not even in the constitution is a fundamental right and no state can pass any law that conflicts with the supreme court s edict, particularly in an area where people have sincerely held religious believes, doesn t that effec