Involvement seems particularly notable. According to the indictment, he played a key role in what appears to be a Pressure Campaign from trump and his co defendant, Valet Walt Nauta and maralago property manager carlos de oliveira, to delete Security Footage from the club after it was subpoenaed by prosecutors. And now, it sure seems like employee 4 could be talking, it turns out, he is an i. T. Worker for maralago named yuscil taveras. According to one new report, taveras himself received a Target Letter from the department of justice after trump was first indicted in florida. But taveras himself has not yet been indicted, and to be clear, as of now, we do not know if taveras is formally cooperating with jack smiths office. That said, as the Washington Post reports, quote, taveras offered information implicating all three defendants in an alleged conspiracy to cover up evidence. And we also know that following trumps indictment, taveras switched lawyers. He was previously represented
Good evening from washington. I am mehdi hasan in for chris hayes. Donald trump could end up behind bars next year for conspiracy to obstruct justice. And if he does, it may very well be because of a new testimony by someone identified by the justice department, only as Trump Employee 4. Now that we have had all weekend to digest the new Superseding Indictment for donald trump from doj special counsel jack smith and the classified documents case, employee number fours involvement seems particularly notable. According to the indictment, he played a key role in what appears to be a Pressure Campaign from trump and his co defendant, Valet Walt Nauta and maralago property manager carlos de oliveira, to delete Security Footage from the club after it was subpoenaed by prosecutors. And now, it sure seems like employee 4 could be talking, it turns out, he is an i. T. Worker for maralago named yuscil taveras. According to one new report, taveras himself received a Target Letter from the departm
talked to her before the primary. so, we know that from the very get-go, gop, sort of, deep rooted interests within north carolina were backing trisha cotham. they say they didn t know that she was gonna switch parties. they say they regarded her as a centrist democrat in a redrawn this rick that was gonna go to a democrat regardless. they wanted someone who would reach across the aisle. and to be fair, that is some of her mystery, some sort of collaborative impulses with republicans on certain issues. however, you are very right to point out that she ran on a pro-choice agenda. she ran as an ally to the lgbtq community. she ran at someone that was gonna get local sheriffs autonomy when it came to going along with ice, among many other policy decisions which now are effectively reversed with her votes, commentary, and other signals. yes, and you guys write how trisha cotham s victory november help democrats locked in enough states to prevent, by a single vote, a republican
centrist democrat in a redrawn this rick that was gonna go to a democrat regardless. they wanted someone who would reach across the aisle. and to be fair, that is some of her mystery, some sort of collaborative impulses with republicans on certain issues. however, you are very right to point out that she ran on a pro-choice agenda. she ran as an ally to the lgbtq community. she ran at someone that was gonna get local sheriffs autonomy when it came to going along with ice, among many other policy decisions which now are effectively reversed with her votes, commentary, and other signals. yes, and you guys write how trisha cotham s victory november help democrats locked in enough states to prevent, by a single vote, a republican super majority in the state house. and then, just three months after she took office, as we ve discussed, she switches parties. i wonder, what has been the reaction in her district? bitterness, betrayal, anger. you know, she s had some pretty awful things to c