Page 5 - Go Fix It News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Go fix it. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Go Fix It Today - Breaking & Trending Today
About whether a a porn star was involved in the then-private citizen after the birth of his child. then we re talking about was there transparency in the democratic process? the same thing that s undertaken robert mueller s team. the whole thing about campaign finance law and about disclosing campaign contributions that won t necessarily impact the election but will help and benefit the campaign. remember, we ve got laws that say you can t even spend more than $2,700 on that. even people who don t know how to do math very well know that 130,000 is a lot more than that, and obviously 11 days before the election, it would have been it would have benefitted in some way. if you don t recall that fact, look to john edwards to who had to deal with it in indictment. now that was a hung injury, but you re seeing that past is prologue here, and history is repeating itself. maybe not with the porn star part 2, but you have the absence of transparency and someone is trying to circumvent a law t ....
Me tomorrow. but you did say you were going to do something about it tomorrow. what did you mean by that? we re going to introduce the disarm act which stands for directing implementation of sanctions and accountability for russian mischief. disarm act. basically what this says you know what we did last summer when we passed, between the house and the senate, on a vote of 517 to 5, sanctions against russia, which the president refused to implement? but we took away all his discretionary authority in that regard, and this legislation would require him to put sanctions against five of the oligarchs that are identified here, and at least five of the organizations that are identified here to have been a party to this. tomorrow congressman denny heck introduces the disarm act, to be absolutely clear. i should add, there s quite a bit of appetite for this. i was on the floor this afternoon and procured 42 ....
Out what she was talking about. but once she said it, it even became stranger because it was clear that michael cohen did this because he was thought her story was in danger of being told. and so tried to get her not to talk this way, and now she s got a new attorney, and this attorney is clearly very aggressive and going to fight this. it s interesting, i ve heard people people have asked me, why are you reporting on something that happened ten years ago? the alleged affair happened 10 years ago. right. but the payoff happened 11 days before the election. that s right. we just found out the $130,000, the payoff, that was in january. so this is new information. there are legal questions about who paid for it, was it a campaign contribution? about election law, right. about election law. michael cohen is saying it was his personal money. lots of people doubt it. michael cohen people are also ....
I m going to fix it, and here s my plan for it. and trump would probably not get particularly involved in the details, but say, you know, go fix it. that s what michael cohen does. i have to get to the break. chris, can you hold that thought? two things i want the viewer to carry to the break. number one, if the law was broken here, how do you feel about that? if the law is broken, how do you feel about that? i don t know that it is, i m not an attorney. number two, had you known this, that the president of the united states s attorney, whether the president was involved or the candidate was involved, if you knew this information, paid $130,000 for someone to keep quiet and then made them sign a non-disclosure agreement about it and then it had gone to arbitration, would you have voted the same way? maybe you would have. i don t know. we ll be right back. more to discuss. , please, oh! ....
Is it possible they would be out of the loop on any such deep study? very unlikely. and why are we studying this 14 months away from when all this happened? so that s kind of an incredulous statement. as well, for him to suggest that it you know, the meddling had no impact really stretches credulity. in the sense of trying to do the best i can to give him the benefit of the doubt, we did say in our assessment that we saw no evidence of meddling with voter tallies. but that s he s conflating that to try to give the impression or the assertion that the meddling had no impact. when you consider that the election basically turned on less than 80,000 votes in three states three key states, ....