campaign. and i m glad to see that the federal government is finally opened its eyes to that and will conduct a full investigation. john wisniewski, let s turn to bridgegate, as it s now being termed. where do you think this is going to lead? there are suggestions today that no actual criminal law may have been broken. do you agree with that, or do you think that ultimately, there will be a legal case to answer in a criminal court? this is an abuse of power. and an attempt to cover up that abuse of power. we have a high-ranking official in the christie administration who used their personal e-mail account to direct that lanes on the george washington bridge be closed for the simple person of harming the town of ft. lee. no matter how you look at it, it s not a proper use of government resources to close lanes on a bridge for a political vendetta. and that s what happened here. so i take exception to any notion that no laws were broken. what we don t know are how many laws were brok
misuse of the $2 million. i think it should have gone to the families that are living in trailers. and i raised that during the campaign. and i m glad to see that the federal government is finally opened its eyes to that and will conduct a full investigation. john wisniewski, let s turn to bridgegate, as it s now being termed. where do you think this is going to lead? there are suggestions today that no actual criminal law may have been broken. do you agree with that, or do you think that ultimately, there will be a legal case to answer in a criminal court? this is an abuse of power. and an attempt to cover up that abuse of power. we have a high-ranking official in the christie administration who used their personal e-mail account to direct that lanes on the george washington bridge be closed for the simple person of harming the town of ft. lee. no matter how you look at it, it s not a proper use of government resources to close lanes on a bridge for a political vendetta. and that
conduct a full investigation. john wisniewski, let s turn to bridgegate, as it s now being termed. where do you think this is going to lead? there are suggestions today that no actual criminal law may have been broken. do you agree with that, or do you think that ultimately, there will be a legal case to answer in a criminal court? this is an abuse of power. and an attempt to cover up that abuse of power. we have a high-ranking official in the christie administration who used their personal e-mail account to direct that lanes on the george washington bridge be closed for the simple person of harming the town of ft. lee. no matter how you look at it, it s not a proper use of government resources to close lanes on a bridge for a political vendetta. and that s what happened here. so i take exception to any notion that no laws were broken. what we don t know are how many laws were broken and who broke them.
decisions about surging u.s. troops without a thorough debate. but gates seems to have a different take op it. he says he saw, quote, a lack of appreciation from the top down of the uncertainties and unpredictability of war in the obama white house. jamie. and he s putting it owl aut there now. molly, thank you so much. greg? some possible legal troubles now swirling around new jersey governor chris christie and his staff. this week it was revealed that one of his aides ordered that three lanes on the george washington bridge be closed for days as punishment because of the mayor of ft. lee would not endorse christie s run for governor. now the u.s. attorney said he s going to look into whether they violated any federal laws. what could this mean for the governor and his staffers? richard st. paul is a defense