Live Breaking News & Updates on Ge Energy Conversion France

Stay updated with breaking news from Ge energy conversion france. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

In Setty, Ninth Circuit Signals Shift in Arbitration Landscape for Non-Signatories | McDermott Will & Emery


To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit tackled the question of whether non-signatories to an agreement may use state law doctrines to compel arbitration. Holding that the claims were insufficiently “intertwined” to permit equitable estoppel and had to be analyzed under federal law (and not state or foreign law), the Court affirmed denial of a non-signatory’s bid to arbitrate its claims for trademark infringement against one of the signatories to a contract governed by Indian law.
Setty v. Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLP, Case No. 18-35573 (9th Cir. Jan. 20, 2021) (Nelson, J.) (Bea, J., dissenting). ....

New York , United States , Balkrishna Setty , Nagraj Setty , Ge Energy Conversion France , Shrinivas Sugandhalaya , Us Court , Outokumpu Stainless United States , Supreme Court , Ge Energy , Partnership Deed , York Convention , Mcdermott Will , Ninth Circuit , Indian Arbitration Act , Stainless United States , Judge Bea , Foreign Arbitral Awards , New York Convention , புதியது யார்க் , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , பால்கிருஷ்ணா செட்டி , நாகராஜ் செட்டி , கே ஆற்றல் மாற்றம் பிரான்ஸ் , எங்களுக்கு நீதிமன்றம் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் ,

9th Circuit Shifts Arbitration Non-Signatories Landscape in Setty


Thursday, February 4, 2021
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit tackled the question of whether non-signatories to an agreement may use state law doctrines to compel arbitration. Holding that the claims were insufficiently “intertwined” to permit equitable estoppel and had to be analyzed under federal law (and not state or foreign law), the Court affirmed denial of a non-signatory’s bid to arbitrate its claims for trademark infringement against one of the signatories to a contract governed by Indian law.
 Setty v. Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLP, Case No. 18-35573 (9th Cir. Jan. 20, 2021) (Nelson, J.) (Bea, J., dissenting).
The dispute arose from a business partnership between brothers. Balkrishna and Nagraj Setty formed in order to continue their late father’s Indian incense business. The brothers signed a partnership deed that included an arbitration provision stating: ....

New York , United States , Balkrishna Setty , Nagraj Setty , Ge Energy Conversion France , Shrinivas Sugandhalaya , Us Court , Outokumpu Stainless United States , Supreme Court , Ge Energy , Partnership Deed , York Convention , Ninth Circuit , Indian Arbitration Act , Stainless United States , Judge Bea , Foreign Arbitral Awards , New York Convention , புதியது யார்க் , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , பால்கிருஷ்ணா செட்டி , நாகராஜ் செட்டி , கே ஆற்றல் மாற்றம் பிரான்ஸ் , எங்களுக்கு நீதிமன்றம் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , கே ஆற்றல் ,