language in the report about my recollection of the events, it is even referenced that i don t remember when my son died. how in the hell dare he raise that? frankly when i was asked the question, it wasn t any of their damn business. let me tell you something. since the day he died, every single day. every memorial day, we hold a service remembering him, attended by friends and family and the people who loved him. i don t need anyone, i don t need anyone to remind me when he passed away. the simple truth is, i sat for five hours, passed away. the simple truth is, i sat forfive hours, two days of events, going back years. at the same time i was handling an international crisis. their task was to make a decision about whether the charges in this case. that is their decision to make. that is hisjob. they decided not their decision to make. that is his job. they decided not to move forward. for any extraneous commentary, they don t know what they are talking about. it has no pla
is just plain wrong. on page 215 if you have the chance, i know it s a thick document, on page 215 the special counsel found the exact opposite. here s what he wrote. there is in fact a shortage of evidence that i willfully retained classified documents related to afghanistan. on page 12 special counsel also wrote for another documents the decision to decline criminal charges was straightforward. the evidence suggested mr. biden did not willfully retain these documents. the evidence said i did not willfully retain these documents. in addition, there are some attention paid to some parts of the report about my recollection of events. there is reference that i don t remember when my son died. how in the hell dare he raise that. frankly when i was asked the question i talk to myself it wasn t any of their damn business. let me tell you something. some of you have commented. eyewear since the day he died every single day the rosary he got. every memorial day we hold a service rem
delay, and delay again, have turned into a war of words. in a ruling issued late afternoon, an hour ago, the judge denied donald trump s request to dismiss the classified documents case based on the presidential records act defense. in essence trump was claiming that he had the right to hold onto national security state secrets because they somehow belonged to him. today judge cannon rejected that rather ridiculous defense handing jack smith an ostensible win. this could be round one on these issues. cannon saying that the criminal charges against trump, quote, make no reference to the presidential record act, never to nor do they rely on the statute for purpose of stating offense, adding, quote, accepting allegations of the superseding indictment is true, the presidential records act does not provide a pretrial basis to dismiss. the judge there leaving the door open to revisiting this issue. and as we ve reported on this broadcast, at that hour yesterday, cannon had asked