Stay updated with breaking news from Garland decision. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
i think this is an activist court. getting rid of roe v wade was an incredible thing for pro-life. simply because people disagree with an opinion is not a basis for questioning the legitimacy of the court. is the u.s. senate confirmation process to blame for polarizing the entire judicial branch? what you want to do is destroy this guy s life, hold this seat open and hope you win in 2020. donald trump, mitch mcconnell and their republican buddies are shoving aside the wishes of the american people in order to steal the supreme court seat. is the court now out of sync with the american public? a court that s already pretty illegitimate is going to be in full crisis mode. and now new questions of ethical standards. have the justices damaged the court s reputation further by failing to disclose financial relationships and gifts from wealthy donors? the perception of the american people is important to me. the highest court in the land should not have ....
that saw the naming of a special counsel to investigate president biden s handling of those and other classified documents found at a private office of the current president and his home in wilmington, delaware. the most recent this morning at the same residence according to merrick garland. this afternoon he named robert hur special counsel and laid out a timeline of the case. on the evening of november 4th, 2022, the national archives office of inspector general contacted a prosecutor at the department of justice. it informed him that the white house had notified the archives that documents bearing classification markings were identified at the office of the penn biden center for diplomacy and global engagement. on november 9th, the fbi commenced an assessment consistent with standard protocols to understand whether classified information had been mishandled in violation of federal law. on november 14th, pursuant to section 600.2b of the special counsel regulations, ....
archives office inspector general contacted a prosecutor at the department of justice. it informed him that the white house had notified the archives that documents bearing classification markings were identified at the office of the penn biden center for diplomacy and global engagement on november 9th the fbi commenced an assessment consistent with standard protocols to understand where the classified information had been mishandled in violation of federal law. on november 14th, pursuant to section 600 point to be of the special counsel regulations, i assign the u.s. attorney laos to conduct an initial investigation to inform my decision whether to appoint a special counsel. on this number 20th, president biden s personal counsel informed mr. laos that additional documents were identified in the garage of the private residence in wilmington delaware. this morning president biden s personal counselor called mr. lausch and stated that additional document bearing classifi ....
for white house officials and biden s attorneys and it will also show that in the end, this was in their words, a mistake, an inadvertent one at that. however the attorney general made a supplement today so that white house officials were not aware of any events and he detailed timelines that none of us were aware of and underscore the fact that when the president first talked about the classified documents earlier this week, he committed a second set of documents we discovered last night. they knew about them, take a listen. the review was underway when you guys made a statement about the documents. there are views underway when the president book about these documents. i don t understand. it does not make sense. the reviews underway the entire time, dealing differences that the headquarters had information on the documents, and he chose to exclude it. until reporters get information on the second set. let me confuse you, for a second, phil. we are trying to do thi ....
For supreme court justices as well? yeah, well, i think my prediction was exactly right. once these things happen, i can t think of an example where they re rolled back. and i think that week senator mcconnell said to senator reid on the floor, you re going to be sorry you did this and you may be sorry you did this sooner than you think. and that s exactly what happened. i just there are almost no instances where you could change the rules in one way and hope that the next senate will say, oh, now it s up to us. well, let s speak of a momentary advantage, the garland decision, the decision not to give garland a committee hearing. you were in the senate then. it was not necessarily your decision. mitch mcconnell s in leadership to do that. in hindsight, was that the right call? you know, i think so. again, and you ve already made this point today, it s all, well, they started it, but in as you said to me earlier, it s always them, right? it s always them. it s always ....