comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Gangulas murthy - Page 1 : comparemela.com

"Recovery Evidence" Under Section 27 Of The Evidence Act- Questions & Answers By Justice V Ramkumar [Part-III]

Q.6 Since the words used in Section 27 are “a person accused of an offence” should there not be a formal accusation against the person in the form of registering an FIR against him?. Ans. No..

Delhi
India
State-of-karnataka
Karnataka
State-of-orissa
Orissa
Kerala
Himachal-pradesh
State-of-kerala
State-of-rajasthan
Rajasthan
George-rankin

Rajesh and Another v. The State of MP : A Patently Erroneous Interpretation Of Section 27 Of Evidence Act By Supreme Court

C O N T E N T SSl. No:I N N E R T I T L E SPARANO.ATHE IMPELLING PROVOCATION FOR THIS ARTICLE. 1BWRONG VERDICTS AT THE TOP MAY BREED MYRIADS OF ILLEGALITIES AT THE BOTTOM.2CPERNICIOUS TREND OF.

India
Karnataka
Bombay
Maharashtra
Bihar
Kerala
Gorakhpur
Uttar-pradesh
State-of-haryana
Haryana
Madhya-pradesh
Delhi

Section 27 Of The Evidence Act Re-Visited In The Wake Of Supreme Court Judgement In "Ramanand @ Nandlal Bharti"

Any discussion on Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 will be incomplete without reference to Sections 25 and 26. Section 25 of the Evidence Act prohibits proof of “confession” made to a.

India
State-of-assam
Assam
Bihar
Delhi
Himachal-pradesh
State-of-haryana
Haryana
State-of-west-bengal
West-bengal
State-of-madras
Tamil-nadu

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.