Totaling nearly half a billion dollars. If a court does not intervene the new york a. G. James can start going after his properties as early as next week. Wouldnt that be a sight. Good morning, everybody. Here we roll on tuesday. Bill hemmer, good morning to you. Dana im dana perino and this is americas newsroom. She might show up herself to do it, right . Since she was in the courtroom every day. Here i am with the padlock and camera. Former President Trump is asking an Appeals Court to delay or reduce the payment as he fights a civil judgment for business fraud. Leticia james says she wont hesitate to start snatching his assets. According to Jonathan Turley the law is on the former president s side. They could appeal this all the way to the Supreme Court. On occasion, the Supreme Court has intervened in state actions. On punitive damages. This is falling into that extreme category in my view. I find it appalling. It shocks the conscious that you have to pony up this type of money jus
sean: welcome to hannity. tonight oregon officials have declared a state of emergency in the city of portland tonight over the growing fentanyl crisis after they decriminalized the hard drugs. sara carter on the ground in portland with a full report. finally a good moment at the grammys. imagine that. will this moment possibly lessen the political divide as many on social media think? decide yourself. first tonight the u.s. senate have released their long-awaited border legislation, and, by the way, it s not just about borders, it s about ukraine, funding $60 billion more, and about israel funding only $14 billion. now this bill does absolutely nothing to secure the border. it would be an unmitigated disaster. by the way, every republican should strongly be opposed to this. it would mandate legal representation for all illegal immigrants. it adds 50,000 extra employment and family reunification visas. it gives biden the power to funnel asylum claims to ports of entry if m
is planning donald trump on trial in august of next year 2024. willis is planning to go forward with that r. i. c. o. trial regardless of the presidential campaign. we begin with this story because that could put her in the spotlight next year. now to our special report. for all the prosecutions that have come out of the january 6th insurrection, from trespassers, to those who blatantly attacked police to the actual malicious seditionist, no trump aid has been put on trial for action steal the election either that day or in the weeks leading up to that day. d. a. fani willis has brought this assertive r. i. c. o. case they are against trump and 18 others, people just starting to learn about this prosecutor. i think it s a choice between integrity and corruption, good and bad. that was willis, but not talking about this case. there, she was discussing what she called a choice during her campaign for this post. and we will get to that in a few moments. it s pretty interes
begin with this story because that could put her in the spotlight next year. now to our special report, for all the prosecutions that have come out of the january 6th insurrection from trespassers to those who blatantly attacked police, no trump aide has been put on trial for actions to steal the election either that day or in the weeks leading up to that day. d.a. fani willis has brought to rico case against trump and 18 others, people just starting to learn about this prosecutor. i think it s a choice between integrity and corruption, good and bad. that was willis but not talking about this case. there she was discussing what she called the choice during her campaign for this post and we will get to that in a few moments. it s pretty interesting. on this case she previewed upcoming arguments by outlining the legal theory that trump and the co-defendants formed a legal gang or racketeering enterprise, which existed to overthrow biden s lawful win in georgia. rather tha
trespassers, to those who blatantly attacked police to the actual malicious seditionist, no trump has been put on trial for action steal the election either that day or in the weeks leading up to that day. d.a. fani willis has brought this assertive r.i.c.o. case they are against trump and 18 others, people just starting to learn about this prosecutor. i think it s a choice between integrity and corruption, good and bad. that was willis, but not talking about this case. there, she was discussing which he called a choice during her campaign for this post. and we will get to that in a few moments. it s pretty interesting. but on this case, she previewed these upcoming arguments by outlining the legal theory that trump and those codefendants actually formed a legal gang, or racketeering enterprise, which existed to overthrow biden s lawful win in georgia. rather than abide by george s legal process for election challenges, the defendants engaged in a criminal racketeerin