Page 3 - G8 Doj News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from G8 doj. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In G8 Doj Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Responsible thing to say, because there s a lot of speculation here and we don t know what we are going to know this time tomorrow. i would also say that the fbi, the department of justice, because of their history with trump and because of a lot of what happened in the run up to the election in 2016, during his presidency, some of the issues they had with him on the crossfire hurricane, the fact that garland came out today was good, i think it was two days too late, frankly. they have to understand that have country looks at everything they do in relation to trump with a critical eye, because of the past issues that they ve had with him, and frankly, some of the things that he has said about them. and, so this transparency is a good thing. i think it came too late. but the transparency will ultimately, i think, lead to greater credibility and legitimacy for whatever legal outcomes are on the horizon. once we have the full information, and we can make a ....
Christopher wray and the attorney general voiced their concerns about the safety of the members of law enforcement. brynn, thank you so much. we ll keep the story in our minds and keep going with it as well. i want to bring in cnn s political commentator, scott jennings as well. scott, but we are just hearing from brands pre standing. what could have happened at that field office, let alone what happened to this person who attempted to attack the field s office. it s a pretty brazen attack on the fbi, of all places. i was wondering, are you worried that we are going to see more violence because of the rhetoric that we have seen being aimed at doj, aimed at long enforcement just in the mar-a-lago search alone? yes, i am. i think we ve learned over the last several years, are people out there who were unhinged and who have obviously emotional problems and get invested in conspiracy theories and take matters into their own hands. this person, if it s the same ....
The substantial public interest in this matter. i would say it s substantial. it s very substantial. you know what s? we should know a lot more about the doj s request by tomorrow. they ve been told to inform the court by 3 pm if trump opposes releasing those documents. there is a lot to talk about here with evan perez, chief political analyst, gloria berger, and elie honig. all of you probably thought we were going to have a nice dinner today and relax a little bit, and there was going to be no big news. all of a sudden on this thursday evening, all of you thought wrong. we begin with you, evan. the fbi searched trump s home. we know this. we re looking for classified documents. but we didn t realize according to washington post, is that they might be related to ....
Nuclear weapons. now, that gives anyone in their right mind, pause if that s true, what are we learning tonight? exactly right. the idea that these documents nuclear weapons programs would be one of the things the fbi was concerned about are looking for, would be a dramatic step. we ve reported today on cnn, we reported that among the disputes, the items that were in dispute during these months and months of back and forth between the trump lawyers and the national archives and the justice department, are documents that have to do with special access programs. is that the nation s most closely guarded national security secrets, nuclear ....
Decided we are going to give back 15 of the boxes to the archives, but not these other 12. who was making that decision and why? i have a question for doj, if indeed doj believed there might be nuclear related documents in there, how on earth does doj let those documents sit in a basement in mar-a-lago for 18 months, and certainly for the last two months? why would they have played nice or negotiated? why would they politely say can you throw padlock on their? why would have gone with a soepoena? they believe and had reason to believe there was no clear related documents in their. should have gone in long before monday. it s a good point to make about that notion. we want to say, gloria? i was going to say maybe they did not know about them until recently. that s my only question. it s all possible. part of this is, and by the way, 3 pm tomorrow, isn t that far away for us to get answers if they decide to make this public and some way, but what we are learning tonight, evan, is t ....