Institute. Critics are saying you kicked the can on this, you pushed it back to facebook instead of having a hardline position or not bringing it back. Why wouldnt you get more definite, whats the point in having the board if youre not going to make a clearcut call. We thought above all this was not about Donald Trump but whether it wasabout facebook. Our role at facebook is to act as an Oversight Board. We look at how facebook does it Content Moderation, what it leaves up, what it takes down and see that its been done in a fair and just way and in fact it was the case we decided that in the decision decided to fool that was a big Risk Appetite so thats the process and its in its role as the enforcer its his job to post the rules and that since we were being taught with them. We were telling them that they follow the process and the adhere to national norms of free expression. You asked facebook to adjustits policies to meet your expectations of what you think is right, do you have any
[inaudible] thank you, sir the epa is sometimes viewed different. I think we all agree we feel the epa does play a role in our government but its how we approach that so to create and force their own policies or do you think that its to look at the legislation in a meaningful legislation that congress has passed to create the policies . Thank you for that question. I can answer very clearly the law that congress has designed and has given us we didnt really feel like they were as transparent. When they were working with congress before even trying to figure out what the intent was and it seemed like the epa was used to the policy driven place than it was actually working with congress. Are you saying that you feel like its going to work with congress regardless of in the majority because theres a good chance that there could be a different party in charge of the house of representatives in the two years. Thats what i did in North Carolina. We had an assembly for the democratic governor
statements. the whistle-blower got caught with chairman schiff. remember chairman schiff, the person that the democrats instead of the house judiciary committee which spent a full week on this, that s not who s been in charge. the person they put in charge was the person that got caught with the whistle-blower. have you spoken directly with the whistle-blower? no, we have not. we d like to. that wasn t true. the person that said he had evidence of the first fake impeachment scam, collusion with russia, had evidence of that collusion and didn t have it. the person who in the course of that read into the record the steele dossier because the people needed to know the truth about what happened. well, we heard about the truth about the steele dossier this week when the inspector general told us it was all garbage, rubbish, all made up, yeah, that chairman schiff, and now he got caught not being truthful about
a whistle-blower who as i said you the other day didn t tell the truth verball
Commerzbank Aktiengesellschaft
Commerzbank Annual General Meeting approves all items on agenda 30-Apr-2024 / 18:17 CET/CEST
The issuer is solely responsible for the content.
The retirement of longtime Oregon congressman, Rep. Earl Blumenauer, has opened up Oregon’s 3rd Congressional District seat and drawn 10 candidates: seven Democrats and three Republicans. The district stretches from Portland to the east and includes most of Multnomah County, parts of Clackamas County along with Hood River County. Democrats represent 44% of registered voters […] The post Q&A: Democratic candidates for 3rd Congressional District answer our questions appeared first on Oregon Capita