Stay updated with breaking news from Fro alvin bragg. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Up late with us. i will see you at the end of tomorrow it was february 23rd of las year, russia was on the brin of invading ukraine th midterms were just beginning t kick into high gear. and this story broke in the ne york times two prosecutors leading new york trump inquiry resign, clouding cases future. two prosecutors in manhattan da s office quit out o frustration with the newly-erected elected alvi bragg was not being aggressive enough in prosecuting donald trump okay yes so that story now feels like it came from an alternate universe manhattan da bragg is now th first prosecutor to brin charges against former president over an alleged hush money scheme around the 2016 election so this picture of alvin bragg as a timid prosecutor afraid t take on donald trump, well ....
Knew that pomerantz might show up for his deposition or interview and therefore he s trying to get the court to prevent that from happening. you make mention of the boo which was not with the approva of the da s office it s clear that alvin bragg is not happy about of the publication of the book. but if you re trump and you re looking to amass you re lookin to gather your defense for a possible second criminal indictment maybe or the on that s already on the table ho much can he get from mar pomerantz? how much can he get from pomerantz that s not in th book if pomerantz is going to be forced to testify or is willin to testify, the interest the answer is a lot. he was the person along with carey dunn who was running thi investigation for at least a year although it was much broader than the charges that were brought. it encompass those charges a well so he no doubt knows a tremendous amount of information about the district attorney s concerns about th case they re assessment th in ....
To proceed in the ordinary course, of chairman jordan i the committee are participatin in a campaign of intimidation, retaliation, and obstruction brexit ernie s detail up campaign of constant harassmen by trump and his republica allies the tweets and the truth socia posts and the fox news interviews they cited tank truth social post calling bragg a - animal and a doctored image of trump holding a baseball bac next to alvin bragg s face so it really has been a lot. and then bragg and his lawyers right about what an absolute constitutional disaster it i to have congress meddling with the state investigation in terms of separation of powers. there are numerous legal citations in this complaint. like this one. federal intrusions into stat criminal trials frustrate both the state sovereign power to punish offenders and their goo ....
That picture doesn t seem to fit the bill anymore for weeks alvin bragg has been the victim of an onslaught slo of attacks on republicans, all eager to defend trump s. they ve used antisemitism an racist dog whistles. and they have used congress. three weeks ago the chairman o the house judiciary committe jim jordan launched an unprecedented investigatio into bragg s office and th da s criminal probe of donal trump. now throughout all of this alvin bragg has consistently fired back at his republican critics. but today alvin bragg took things up a notch. in a lawsuit filed by federa court today da bragg sue congressman jordan for interfering with bragg s criminal case against trump. bragg s lawyers right in the filing that congressma jordan s investigation constitutes a, quote unprecedentedly brazen unconstitutional attack by members of congress. they continue, rather than ....
He s investigating does that matter to those tweets, do thos explicit statements were gonna come get to alvin bragg, d those matter in the context of the judge was going to b handling this complaint for th da i think they will matter to the judge because they wil show that whatever is advanced first of all it s gonna have t be more than this for jordan t go forward with this but he will be allowed, jordan to come up with completely new rationales that are nowher allowed in his forme statements the way courts ought to look a this is the little legislato essentially have a do-over so i do think the statements will discredit whatever they come up with and to be sure if all they can come up with is what you v just read that isn t enough. but it won t be essentially up to the subjective statements b jordan the lawyers can now come in an offer some completely ne superficial pretextual explanation for what they re doing. that will be the clash i court. i have to say when you look at this ....