The Court of Appeal held that it would be inconsistent with the purpose of the statutory scheme, and wording of Sch 1, if the court did not have the power to make a settlement of property order for the benefit of a person who would be over 18 when it took effect; however, protecting the children from the financial pressure or ‘manipulation’ the appellant might exert had not come within the scope of an ‘exceptional’ circumstance which would have justified making an outright capital award in favour of an adult child.
Solicitor jailed for £380k stamp duty fraud | Mortgage Introducer mortgageintroducer.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from mortgageintroducer.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
AB v CD & Ors [2021] EWHC 741 (Fam) Date:8 APR 2021
Medical treatment - Gender Dysphoria – Consent – Young person prescribed puberty blockers – Decision in
Bell – Whether parents could continue to consent to treatment.
A declaration was granted that the mother and father retained the ability in law to consent to their child’s treatment with puberty blockers.
For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage
of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court
nd European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.
Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down by the judge remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email and release to Bailii. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be 10.30am on 26 March 2021
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194 Date:5 MAR 2021
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)
Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due to change of circumstances – Child expressing a wish to remain in UK – Appeal
The appeal from the set aside of a return order was granted.
For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage
of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court
nd European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.
Case No: B4/2020/2010
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY DIVISION
Introduction
1. On Sunday 20 November 2016, probably in the early hours of that day, S then aged 10, died in her bedroom at the family home. This case is concerned with the question as to whether the circumstances of her death pose a risk to her younger siblings so as to require the intervention of the state.
2. The family home was that of her parents. Also living there were two older brothers, E and W. S also had three younger siblings, a sister X and two brothers, Z and A. Apart from them, nobody else lived in the house.
3. On the night in question the whole family were present in the house, but, at least so far as they were aware, there was no one else. In due course, I will have to consider whether in fact an intruder entered during the night.