prosecutor with the southern district of new york. first of all, your reaction to this judgment? i am your reaction to this udgment? i am not surprised. your reaction to this udgment? i am not surprised. i your reaction to thisjudgment? i am not surprised. i think your reaction to thisjudgment? i n not surprised. i think everything pointed to this outcome. the argument indicated that the judge is inclined to disallow this motion to dismiss and i expected the decision and it came quickly. i5 dismiss and i expected the decision and it came quickly. and it came quickly. is that partly because of and it came quickly. is that partly because of the and it came quickly. is that partly because of the judge s and it came quickly. is that partly. because of the judge s questioning of prince andrew s lawyers at the time or is it because of the basis of his case? the questioning of his lawyers was really to the point and expressed the judge s scepticism about the arguments. the argume
throw it out at this stage by acquiescing to prince andrew s argument that there is no argument here, the settlement releases prince andrew and it can t be sued by virginia giuffre. so, this is really significant, it lines up with my interpretation of the hearing we had last week, judge kaplan s views in the hearing were very sceptical, i thought, of prince andrew s arguments, so i m not surprised this is what he s decided based on how he was approaching these arguments last week, but it is a very very significant. now we all move forward to the phase where we have discovery or disclosure of documents and evidence and i don t think prince andrew would ever have expected to be facing in order to hand over documents relating to this suit. i think it s really significant and an important day in terms ofjustice. break it down for us, i write out some of the wording of the judgment