craig melvin: the story gripped the nation in the series making a murderer. so many americans have learned about it. laura nirider: it s being heard by people around the world. craig melvin: steven avery and his nephew, convicted of murder and the haunting killing of a young photographer. but were they really innocent? andrea canning: did you have any kind of vendetta against steven avery? absolutely not. craig melvin: for the first time on television, a lead investigator defends his interrogation which led to a conviction overturned. andrea canning: this was seen by many as a false confession. i feel it was a real confession. he knew right from wrong. laura nirider: those officers wanted that information in the worst way, and they got it in the worst way. craig melvin: the prosecutor fights back with an explosive book. people are going to hear the other side of the story. craig melvin: and a promise from steven avery s high-powered, new attorney. andrea canning: do you thi
people think that stephen avery is innocent. they made him look like he was a nice person. the evidence is wrong, the evidence is beyond overwhelming. he is guilty. the story grip the nation in the series making a murderer. so many americans have learned about it. it has been world stephen avery and his nephew convicted of murder in the haunted killing of a young phenom photographer. i did not do it. did you have any kind of vendetta against stephen avery? absolutely. not for the first time on television, a lead investigator defenses investigation, which led to a conviction. this was seen too many by a false conviction. he knew right from wrong. officers want that information in the worst way, and they got it in the worst way. the prosecutor fight back with an explosive book. people are going to hear the over other side of the story. do you think you have new evidence that could face stephen avery? stephen avery? welcome to dateline. it s an extraord
especially when the crime lab found avery s dna on it, it would become a highly controversial clue in this case. the evidence was stacking up against steven avery, and fassbender says that that rav4 would later tell investigators one last thing. we have tested the hood latch, and found dna matching stephen on the hood wretch. they believe that avery had some explaining to do, so nine days after the disappearance, brought avery in for an interview. dateline filed a freedom of information request for the video. avery was defiant, and even claimed cops were framing him, planting evidence. fassbender and uyghur were not buying, it and play stephen avery under arrest.
Thoughts about what we ve learned so far from john durham s investigation into the russian collusion lie? what we saw this week as sussmann, the clinton campaign, the dnc all try to fight having to disclose evidence and having to disclose information, they re going to court and file fighting. well, this has given the opportunity for durham because he s had to fight these objections to actually place direct evidence on the record. now, as people well know, we built a circumstantial case using circumstantial evidence. we knew, for example, that the dnc, the media, fusion gps, they were all coordinating, building a narrative and laying it out for the american people. but we never actually had the e-mails. and now there are hundreds of e-mails that hoe what we knew five years ago was that the fake news media was in cahoots with the left in country and the clinton campaign to try to defeat donald trump by framing him, maligning him. and not just him, but many, many others that got tied up
you use the word agreed, so you brought it up first? yes, i believe so. that s one of the areas you came under fire for. yes. you are planting things in his mind? yes, that s what they said. and there are instances that we did ask in specific about things, yes. and that can happen in an interview. can we take that as a reliable answer, given how it was fed to him? i would argue no and say based on the entirety of the interview, i would say, yes. as for that other moment that angered so many followers of the case all right. i m going to come out and ask you, who shot her in the head? he did. any regrets about that, bringing it up yourselves? putting that in his head? there s always things you can improve on. there are instances because of brendan s personality that we had to talk to him about and ask more specifically certain questions, and that happens. what do you say to those