It is absolutely stunning. We just got thumped. I mean, i know that everybody got a lot of snow and this was a big storm, but i feel like somebody played a joke on me. Yeah. This is an insane amount of snow. I will pack some of it into cooler and send it to you. Rachel, you had Jim Rutenberg on talking about that New York Times article which is just amazing, and by the way, must be said, beautifully written. I think it may be the best written yeah. Of the trump investigative pieces. Andrew weissmann is going to join us on the same subject to pick up where you left off which to me is are there new crimes in this reporting that were looking at . Yeah. The times uses the very gentle word, extralegal. Does that mean illegal . Andrew weissmann is going to take us through it and tell us what he sees in that reporting. Excellent. Its really well timed. Tomorrow were going to see the response from the president s defense team, such as it is, to the Impeachment Charges and the Impeachment Charg
Rachel, you had Jim Rutenberg on talking about that New York Times article which is just amazing, and by the way, must be said, beautifully written. I think it may be the best written yeah. Of the trump investigative pieces. Andrew weissmann is going to join us on the same subject to pick up where you left off, which for me is, are there new crimes in this reporting that were looking at . Yeah. The times uses the very gentle word, extralegal. Does that mean illegal . Andrew weissmann is going to take us through it and tell us what he sees in that reporting. Excellent. And its really well timed. Tomorrow were going to see the response from the president s defense team, such as it is, to the Impeachment Charges and the Impeachment Charges are about him inciting an insurrection against the u. S. Government. And what rutenberg and his colleagues just filled in is a lot of the details about how they knew exactly what they were setting up. How they organized it and how it was a coordinated t
Cases. The justices are expected to hand out a decision next spring. [screams] you will hear argument first in 587, the department of Homeland Security versus legions of the university of california and the related cases. General francisco,. In 2017, the fifth circuit held a daca in the expansion of daca was likely unlawful. The judgment affirmed by equally divided courts. In the face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security reasonably determined that it no longer wish to retain the daca policy. Based on his belief that the policy was illegal with serious doubts about the illegality and the general proposition abroad not efficient policy. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The rescission ended up nonenforcement policy whereby the department agreed to not enforce against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. But the decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the agency under fuel discussio
The justices are expected to hand out a decision next spring. [screams] you will hear argument first in 587, the department of Homeland Security versus legions of the university of california and the related cases. General francisco,. In 2017, the fifth circuit held a daca in the expansion of daca was likely unlawful. The judgment affirmed by equally divided courts. In the face of those decisions, the department of Homeland Security reasonably determined that it no longer wish to retain the daca policy. Based on his belief that the policy was illegal with serious doubts about the illegality and the general proposition abroad not efficient policy. That decision did not violate the apa for two reasons. First, it is not subject to judicial review. The rescission ended up nonenforcement policy whereby the department agreed to not enforce against hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. But the decision whether or not to enforce the law is committed to the agency under fuel discussion unles
Planned to ask the u. S. Not to impose tariffs on december 15th, 15 tariffs. Not seeing the Vice President s speech Strong Enough to stop the trade progress. Still chinese saying the speech was full of arrogance, hypocrisy as well as lies. Spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign ministry pushing back on the human rights accusations. Turning it around on the u. S. , highlighting income gap between rich and poor, pulling back from treaties and mass shootings. We advice people in the night to take a good look at themselves in the mirror to recognize their own problems, manage their own affairs. Vice president chief of staff made a point directly, to talk plainly to the chinese government, plus tell them that the u. S. Is willing to work with them. I think the Vice President extend ad hand to say we do not want to decouple from china. Were anxious to have a trade deal. At same time, what i think we have seen administrations do, republican, democrat alike. Once we allow china in the world trad