President donald trump set to appear in washingtoned to claiming he knowingly made false statements from the 2020 election. Carley now his team is moving the case out of washington d. C. , arguing he wont get a fair trial there. Brooks, brook, good morning. Thats right, President Trump and attorneys are warning of a potential bias, jury could have against him, trump taking to his truth social writing, the latest fake case brought by Crooked Joe Biden and deranged jack smith will hopefully be moved to an impartial venue, west virginia, impossible to get a fair trial in washington d. C. We are learning about the six coconspirators listed in the former president s indictment brought by Special Counsel jack smith. A lawyer for attorney john eastman tells fox news he believes eastman is coconspirator number two. The memo cited in the indictment claims eastmans legal memos to former President Trump contributed to his alleged attempt to over throw the 2020 election. But eastmans attorney main
Price of oil today, wti crude well below 90 a barrel and sort of a line in the sand. We are at 88. 78. We were at 87 and change moments ago. Consistent with that, lets put up the u. S. 10year Interest Rates. Dropping. Were looking at 2. 35 . Pretty much a Straight Line down mirroring what were seeing as you mentioned in oil and stocks. It might be a classic riskoff kind of day and we have the panel to talk about and a new warning on Housing Market. Is a triple dip . Some see it hitting a speed bump. Find out whos saying that and could mean for the market and the economy. Big day here for the cnbc next 25. Three top candidates for that very exclusive list will be with us today. Melody hobson, Anne Wojcicki and kal cole with us. They will be with us today on closing bell. Yes. A lot coming up. Markets, as bill mentioned, pretty much the lows of the session. Dow off 200. 1 today. The nasdaq losing 50 points. S p off by about 20. Russell 2000, art cashi this morning on show yesterday we sh
Those meetings but one . I dont know the details of those meetings. I cant recall the details of those meetings. I can assure you that there were no, nothing that would trigger an ex parte. So you meet with the white house multiple times during the open Comment Period after the Comment Period closes, and were supposed to believe that one of the most important things the fcc has ever done that this didnt come up and they didnt have any discussions and they didnt comment back to you. Is that what were supposed to believe . The administration was very scrupulous in making it clear that i was an independent agency and they were not telling i guess the point is chairman. You met with them multiple times. They came to visit you. You went to visit them. We invite you to come in an open and you refuse. We asked you to send us documents and you didnt send us a single one. Thats very troubling for us. I need to move on. Mr. Chairman, one thing here, i did agree to come. Im here. No before the ru
July 17th. September 11th. September 30th. October 15th. October 28th. And then mr. Zinaz visiting with you on november 9th at the fcc. Does that sound accurate . If thats the list that we provided, sir. And you only provided an ex parte for one of those meetings. Why is that . First of all the rules are quite clear on what constitutes an ex parte. And that is an attempt to file specifically in a specific docket and to influence the outcome of that docket did you discuss this just and. Dids you discuss this matter during those meetings. And there are provisions long established going back to the Bush Administration also legislative council. I have five minutes. I need to ask very specific. You are asking about ex partes. And there is no requirement that there be an ex parte file. There was no need either. I dont understand that. You met with them. Youre telling me this proposed rule did not come up in any of those proposed meetings but one. I dont know the details of those meetings. I
Job as trying to adhere to the statute and the rules that have been put in place to deliver on those concepts. Purchase thank the gentleman. As i recognize mr. Walker here i want to respond to what you just said and highlight, again, under the rules you did have the discretion to make it public and you elected not to. I think what congress should consider is compelling you to make that open and transparent rather than just simply makes it discretionary. Recognize the gentleman from North Carolina mr. Walker for five minutes. Thank you mr. Chairman. Being a relatively new member in congress, im learning things every day. In fact, i had already known that al gore had invented the internet, but today i found out, according to miss maloney that the president has saved the internet. Just to be curious, do you think thats a statement thats fair . Do you think his involvement has saved the internet for the future . I think this is a much bigger issue, congressman. I think the internet is the