Commuting and lunch breaks in the u. S. City of minneapolis, apparently backtracks on its pledge to Defund Police in the wake of killing by throwing more money at the force instead theyre you watching us international. Thanks for joining us. Lets start this hour in the United States where the 2020 president ial election is still far from over counting and recounting drags on in a number of states nearly 2 weeks after the vote, the trump administrations adamant the president will secure a 2nd term my own view or looking at this election that we, we have what appears in some sense to be an immaculate deception that were moving forward here at the white house. Knew sumption that there will be a 2nd term Media Outlets have called the election for joe biden. But donald trump has yet to concede victory, and hes claiming that the election was fraudulent. His team of lawyers, legal challenges in several states and demanded recounts one of which in fact is already underway in georgia with a rac
Cooperate to proceed as if i wasnt here for the first argument so let me focus on whats different about texas. One thing thats different abtexas is its definition of social media platforms excludes website. We can put the gmail issue to one side when talk about texas. It also excludes websites primarily focused on news, sports and entertainment. In the First Amendment business we call that contentbased discrimination. Thats one of the reasons this statute is unconstitutional. The other thing thats different is that in some respects this statute operates more simply because it forebids my clines from engaging in viewpoint discrimination. Were used to thinking that viewpoint discrimination is a bad thing and the government shouldnt do it. And of course when governments do it it is a bad thing. When editors of speakers engage in viewpoint discrimination that is their First Amendment right. It is also absolutely vital to the operation of these websites because if you have to be viewpoint n
They have to keep it separate in their mind. Issue a ruling. This runs about 2 1 2 hours. Cooperate to proceed as if i wasnt here for the first argument so let me focus on whats different about texas. One thing thats different abtexas is its definition of social media platforms excludes website. We can put the gmail issue to one side when talk about texas. It also excludes websites primarily focused on news, sports and entertainment. In the First Amendment business we call that contentbased discrimination. Thats one of the reasons this statute is unconstitutional. The other thing thats different is that in some respects this statute operates more simply because it forebids my clines from engaging in viewpoint discrimination. Were used to thinking that viewpoint discrimination is a bad thing and the government shouldnt do it. And of course when governments do it it is a bad thing. When editors of speakers engage in viewpoint discrimination that is their First Amendment right. It is also
The Supreme Court also heard oral argument in another case that questions whether states can restrict content moderation on social media. The justices will have until june to will on this case. This comes out of florida. It is about 2 1 2 hours. We will hear argument next in case 22 555 netchoice versus paxton. If it may please the court, i dont want to proceed as if i wasnt here for the first argument. Let me focus on whats different about paxton. One thing that is different is its definition of social media platforms excludes websites. We can put the gmail issue to one side for talking about texas. The other it excludes is websites that are primarily focused on news sports and entertainment. In the First Amendment business we call that contentbased discrimination. Thats one of the many reasons this is spatially unconstitutional. The other different is in some respects this statute operates were simply because it forbids my clients from engaging in viewpoint discrimination. We are use
Cooperateo proceed as if i wasnt here for the first argument so let me focus on whats dferent about texas. One thing thats different abxas is its definition of social media platforms excludes website. Wean put the gmail issue to one side when lkbout texas. It also excludes websitesor and. In the First Amendmentusess we call that contentbased discrimination. Thatsnef the reasons this statute is unconstitutional. The other thg thats different is that iso respects this statute operates more simply because it f clines from engaging iviewpoint discrimination. Were edo thinking that viewpointiscrimination is a bad thing and the government shouldnt do it. Do it it is a bad thing. When editors of speakers enga in viewpoint discrimination that is their first amendntight. It is also absolutely vital to the operation of these websites because if you have to be viewpot neutral that means suicideyou have materials that prevention you also haveo ve materials that advocate suicide promotion. Or if yo