street journal who closely followed trump s campaign and his time as president. donald trump gave you a couple of interviews for the book, and you covered his presidency from the very beginning. he s called you one of the tough ones but such beautiful hair, which, yeah, i agree. anyway, have you heard from him directly or indirectly about the book and its revelations? i haven t heard from him directly since our interviews about the book. the only way i heard from him was when he singled me out and singled out this book by attacking it, and i will say i m glad he didn t go after my hair, disparage my hairdo because then i would know he was really upset. he s attacking this book because he knows how many people i talked to in the process of reporting this and how many people talked to me who don t normally talk to journalists because he and i discussed some of the things i knew in both of our interviews, and that s what he s worried about. tell me about the interview process with do
he insults her. he s yelling at canada. he sells out our allies to serve our enemies. why do that? there s no reason to do this. it doesn t make sense to me. if there wasn t anything to it, they wouldn t go around trying to cover their tracks. and, look, his entire 2016 campaign was predicated on the notion that hillary clinton was sloppy with secrets. so, i mean, it is the absolute convergence of absolutely every doubt that people had about donald trump. we talked about that last hour, willie. hillary clinton was not qualified to be president of the united states because hamered away at it. she was sloppy with classified information. in fact, he said it was, quote, disquali disqualifying. locker up chants are about that. this, if the report something tri-true, not the potential exposure but direct relaying of secret. lock her up chants led not only by trump but national security adviser, then his
congress to slow down this one-way train. they just have to do it in the next year. let s take a look at the gps of where this runaway train is right now. multiple outlets have confirmed the bombshell story that the washington post broke yesterday with anonymous u.s. officials saying the trump administration scrambled to clean up an intelligence spill after president trump allegedly volunteered highly classified information in a meeting with the russian foreign minister and ambassador last week. according to the paper, the information had originally been provided by a u.s. partner through an intelligence sharing arrangement, consideri iningcon sensitive details have been when would from allies and so tightly restricted within the u.s. government. they had not given them permission to share the intel with russia and trump s doing so
protege or whatever, buddy on the road, general flynn, who has now been fired. for meet org communicating with the ambassador kislyak. ultimately the president s words are now going to chew him up. take a look. some bad things came out today. you know, those classified you know the word classified. this was not just extreme carelessness with classified material. which is still totally disqualifying. this is calculated, deliberate, premeditated misconduct. the secretary of state was extremely careless and negligent in handling our classified secrets. she lied about passing on classified information, right? in my administration, i m going to enforce all laws concerning the protection of classified
that s what the president s position is. given that you refuse to confirm or deny any of this, how is any senior official supposed to feel comfortable having a conversation with the president? as i said, hallie, the president has made his position clear. hallie, i answered the question over and over again the same way. how has the president made it clear what his position is? i ve answered that several time. how has he made it clear? that s his position. he said he has nothing further to add. lord. sean spicer yesterday, not answering questions on whether the housemaid secret recordings. why can t they answer that? why can t they answer that? because they can t answer anything. basic question. and i m not exaggerating. donald trump has secret recordings? does he? does he or doesn t he? they taught news law school he who does not deny admits. right? on something like this, this is like, again, nixonian. why can t they deny this? it s like the tax returns. w