directly. so when david said something like that, that donald trump knows the political reality, is that a fair assessment, the political reality is you won t get these things through congress? i mean, let s also recognize the fact that they are supporting arming teachers which is also not going to get through congress. but that is something that the nra supports. so the whole foegs notion of whether it could get through congress is not the case on this particular piece of gun safety measure. but just going back to what david said, it is remarkable and with due respect to david, part of the christian broadcast network, our these issues of character are really negotiable. the president told us and lester holt after a rally that he would no longer act that way. he was calling ted cruz that. the quote from him was when you are president, you would act differently. that is what he said to lester. clearly that hasn t happened. clearly that is not the case. one could say, well, sto
or trying to find something he did wrong? in other words, he went after capone because he is a killer and a bad guy, an awful human being, a criminal on every way. let s get him on taxes. are they going after they believe he did wrong or going after him because they don t like him? my understanding is the foegs in the criminal investigations unit are nonpartisan. they would not go going on a fish examining that he addition. what do they believe he did wrong? i m open to this answer. what do they smell that they don t like? my understanding is one of the biggest skerns about paul manafort. that he may have used foreign banking accounts. if that s true and he didn t reveal that when he fwild the irs, it is a liability. it was once conceived unimaginable that north korea
itself. so totally gruesome, the idea of using these at all. anthony may, an explosive expert. thank you so much, sir. the aftermath of the deadly attacks in paris. we are here in france. there are many developments, france is a country now at war. this coming from the french president as he sent in war planes. there s even more activity here in france at home. right now there s a massive show of force on these streets saying that they are at war when the president said that here that also enabled him to activate a state of emergency and enhanced police powers. the investigation is the foegs focus of a manhunt who might
and do you feel that they were telling you what you wanted to hear? what is the implication? well, the implication is just wrong. and again, the cia directors are making it clear that they got it wrong time after time after time. the foegs that the notion th not identified at the white house is not true. i sat in meetings with the cia and the example that the president did not know is a lie and it is not true. we we were in fact how was the president preefed? he with was briefed. by the cia or you? i was heavily involved as especially the national security council and conde. and the president write ss abou it in his book. well, three pages in his book he writes about it, but you were briefed directly, and he was briefed indirectly most of the time, is that fair to say? no, that is not fair to say. he and i met every single morning with the ci, and the
hear? what is the implication? well, the implication is just wrong. and again, the cia directors are making it clear that they got it wrong time after time after time. the foegs that the notion th not identified at the white house is not true. i sat in meetings with the cia and the example that the president did not know is a lie and it is not true. we we were in fact how was the president preefed? he with was briefed. by the cia or you? i was heavily involved as especially the national security council and conde. and the president write ss abou it in his book. well, three pages in his book he writes about it, but you were briefed directly, and he was briefed indirectly most of the time, is that fair to say? no, that is not fair to say. he and i met every single morning with the ci, and the director of the director of