rapid advances would move quickly into the country, it also sees the capital kyiv, where a combination of missile strikes and action by special forces would knock out ukrainian government. of course, what has happened is the ukrainian forces have put up much more effective resistance than the russians appeared to have planned for. that and difficulties in logistics has greatly slow down the rate of advance, particular in the north, around kyiv and kharkiv. find north, around kyiv and kharkiv. and when we look north, around kyiv and kharkiv. and when we look at the ukrainian defence, particularly when it comes to their defence in the air, what assessments do you have of how they have fought back? it assessments do you have of how they have fought back? have fought back? it has been quite a remarkable have fought back? it has been quite a remarkable achievement. - have fought back? it has been quite a remarkable achievement. the - a remarkable achievement. the russians would have t
significant difference at a tactical level. but i would put a cautionary note on this. the evidence from the images and reports of the fighting suggests that the russian forces are not very effective in doing combined arms tactics. if they can become more effective at combined armed tactics, which involves synchronising tanks, infantry, engineers and artillery, they could make it much more difficult for the ukrainian defenders to use these anti tank weapons. ukrainian defenders to use these anti-tank weapons. ukrainian defenders to use these anti-tank weapons. there have been some assessments anti-tank weapons. there have been some assessments from anti-tank weapons. there have been some assessments from m - anti-tank weapons. there have been | some assessments from m dutchman from military commentators, that on all fronts to some extent, russian forces have stalled, whether it is because they have got cheap tires that can t cope with the terrain more or whether troops have just d