case coming up, which will look moderate compared to sb-8. sb-8 says six weeks. i want to point out something everyone is missing. it s not six weeks from conception. it s six weeks from the last menstrual cycle. which means you may only be less than a month pregnant when this ban comes into effect. so that s something that really is important. there s not enough time in texas. it s clearly a violation of roe and casey. the 15 weeks is also, but it s starting to sound reasonable in comparison. but there are a lot of cases coming up in the supreme court, not just the dobbs v. mississippi, but other cases that are based on either the first amendment religious exception, first amendment freedom of expression, which is an interesting there s one fecv. cruz, senator cruz has
judiciary should constitute expression it is uncharted for courts to say what is are and what is not. oregon appellate court got it wrong when they decided the artist real expressed by mrs. cline and her custom cakes were not entitleed first amendment protection afforded to other mediums of artistic expression. why they had what they were looking to. arguing andmenting to appeal is going to be based on the first amendment issue. the way they got around that in going into the public docket reason that looks at ordinary businesses in commerce as brick and mortar operations that fall outside of typical first amendment freedom of expression and religious freedom protections. court did that to get to the end result it wanted to pleas it
what constitutes artistic expression. legally, uncharted territory for courts to say, what is art and what is not. iella here, the court got it wrong when they d decided the artistry by mrs. klein in her custom handcrafted cakes was not entitled to the same type of first amendment protection that other mediums of artistry and artistic art expression. jason: they did have an oregon state law they were looking to, but the issue theyig will be arguing and wanting to appeal is going to be based on the first amendment issue, correct? the way they a got around it, going into the public doctrine thatç looks at ordinary businesses as brick-and-mortar type of operations that fallendm outside of typical first amendment freedom of expression and religious freedom protections. the court did that to get to the end result that it wanted to
judiciary should constitute expression it is uncharted for courts to say what is are and what is not. oregon appellate court got it wrong when they decided the artist real expressed by mrs. cline and her custom cakes were not entitleed first amendment protection afforded to other mediums of artistic expression. why they had what they were looking to. arguing andmenting to appeal is going to be based on the first amendment issue. the way they got around that in going into the public docket reason that looks at ordinary businesses in commerce as brick and mortar operations that fall outside of typical first amendment freedom of expression and religious freedom protections. court did that to get to the end result it wanted to pleas it
the court ruled unanimously that officers in arkansas were within their rights when they fired 15 shots at point blank range into a car on a rampage, killing both the driver and passenger. it s a victory for law enforcement because the court ruled that officers acted reasonably. it was a good day for u.s. secret service as well. the supreme court siding with the secret service involving the president s detail. another interesting case. another unanimous decision for law enforcement here. this is a first amendment freedom of expression case dating back to the administration of george w. bush. on a re-election campaign stop in oregon and went to dinner where there were protesters on one side and supporters of the president on the other side of the street. the secret service moved the protesters out but let the supporters stay put. the question was whether they did it to keep the protester s viewpoints from being expressed. the court held the secret service officials had qualified i m