lot of time for things to get better. and i think the tragic thing is, people lost their lives in the process. and we need to make sure that doesn t happen again. figs process. and we need to make sure that doesn t happen again.- that doesn t happen again. as you sa , a lot that doesn t happen again. as you say. a lot of that doesn t happen again. as you say, a lot of people that doesn t happen again. as you say, a lot of people did that doesn t happen again. as you say, a lot of people did lose - that doesn t happen again. as you say, a lot of people did lose their| say, a lot of people did lose their lives in the process, people lost loved ones. are you saying that you believe deaths could have been avoided? , , ., , , avoided? definitely, deaths could have been avoided, avoided? definitely, deaths could have been avoided, deaths - avoided? definitely, deaths could have been avoided, deaths didn t| have been avoided, deaths didn t need to be at the level that they have been.
white house. i think the president had an indelible impact on the ig s process. i know that the process that i went through was one that was unfair, left out multiple pieces of relevant information, and the testimony of witnesses who were never referenced in the report. tonight, mccabe s legal team did not respond to fox s request for comment. when it comes to lying or lack of candor under oath. what matters here according to former fbi agents is that the bureau is held to a higher standard because they are the ones that enforce the law. sean: i will tell you one thing that i think is unfair. didn t mccabe tell lieutenant general flynn that he didn t need a lawyer just prior to comey bragging about sending people in that he would never do that in the bush or obama administration to take advantage of the chaos knowing it was an interrogation russian mark wouldn t that be to me, that sounds like miranda rights violations. that seems unfair if they knew it was investigation but i do
white house. i think the president had an indelible impact on the ig s process. i know that the process that i went through was one that was unfair, left out multiple pieces of relevant information, and the testimony of witnesses who were never referenced in the report. reports did not respond to request for comment when it comes to lying or lack of candor under oath. what matters here according to former fbi agents is that the bureau is held to a higher standard because they are the ones that enforce the law created sean: i will tell you one thing that i think is unfair. didn t mccabe tell lieutenant general flynn that he didn t need a lawyer just prior to call me bragging about sending people in that he would never do that in the bush orb obama administration to take advantage of the chaos knowing it was an interrogation russian mark wouldn t that be to me that sounds like miranda rights violations. that seems unfair if they knew
that might mean for our political process? well, it s hard for me to say how big of a deal that would be, for instance, to the work that the special counsel and his team are doing. but even putting that aside, i think it s enormously significant for a participant in those schemes to step forward and indicate that one of his cohorts, one of his coconspirat coconspirators, was the president, the current president of the united states. that will be a remarkable thing to hear from a witness, if that s, in fact, what we hear. but people expect that already, and i wonder, you know about the doj guidance better than i ever will on why they don t believe indicting a sitting president, but the southern dikt tickstrict could been much more effusive about the president, individual one. is there any what could the government do with that? what could politicians do with that information? well, i can t say what politicians would do with it but i think there are probably folks
now as my team attempts to uncover the igs own processes and policies and rules that should guide a fair and impartial process, we had to sue them in federal court to get access to information that, as i understand, they are obligated to provide to the public. do you think the ig did what they did with your findings because of the president? i think the president had an impact on the igs process. i know that the process that i went through was one that was unfair and was one that left out multiple pieces of relevant information. the testimony of witnesses that were never referenced in the report. i have great surveillance pigs th suspicion that the president s clear desire had a impact on it. he said mccabe had it out for me. he opened up this investigation with it, you re making a similar