the beating of two police officers in new york expected back before a judge any time today. this as the d.a. presents evidence to a grand jury. all of this now adding pressure to that impeachment vote in the house. this is malfeasance. active neglect on the part of the secretary and since he won t do the honorable thing and resign, the house needs to hold him accountable by impeachment. the only choice we have. dana: over in the senate the border security bill all but breaks down facing bipartisan backlash. what will congress do now? aishah hosni live on capitol hill with more. good morning to you. the past 24 hours have been nothing short of stunning here. we knew the border deal was dead on arrival in the house. not likely to make it out of the senate. republicans are poised to tank a procedural vote tomorrow. the author of this big bipartisan deal, the republican author, is likely to vote no on it as well as well as the senate majority leader minority leader. senat
catch me tomorrow and following my friend and colleague, i will be back next saturday as well at two pm eastern. and symone starts right now. greetings, everyone. you are watching symone. we are keeping an eye on capitol hill. senators are working through the weekend to try to come up with a framework for immigration and border security measures. senate democrats are hoping this will help republicans get on board, given very egan urgently needed aid to ukraine and israel. but even if the senators strike a, deal house republicans and progressive democrats are in no mood to compromise. i like this. what is ahead and what is at stake. plus, polls show a majority of americans think abortion should be illegal. but in post roe america, voters are trying to protect women s rights and by changing their state constitutions. we are talking to the speaker of the house in pennsylvania about their efforts to preserve abortion access. there is also a lot of buzz about the color purpl
on security, and through the prism of the baltic states. as former members of the soviet union, lithuania, estonia and latvia have been sounding the alarm about the existential threat they face from russia ever since theyjoined the nato alliance two decades ago. this year, they have been the loudest voices within the european union urging allies to go further and faster, raising the alarm about the kremlin s real intentions. this past week, the russians removed buoys that were marking the border with estonia on the narva river. the russian defence ministry briefly published a plan to revise its maritime border in the baltic sea, which was then quickly deleted, the kind of tactics that put all three countries on edge. the baltic states see two possibilities on the horizon. the first, if russia were to succeed in ukraine, is that they would try to exploit a weakened west. perhaps a surprise attack in the baltic states, followed up with a credible nuclear threat. the second scen
revolution to overthrow the government so trump can stay in power. i hope that congress doesn t stop with just some of the proud boys which they are subpoenaing and the oath keepers, but lauren boebart. she tweeted today is 1776 when she knew that was code for violent revolution for those on the right. i want that answer. to fee a, less than a minute. what do you think? jonathan, what i m concerned about is our founding principles. our founding fathers gave us three co-equal branches of government for a reason. congress has oversight authority and what i do not like, whether it s democrat or republican; that the congress won t even stand up for itself in this instance and understand that they want the right to issue subpoenas. they want people to comply with congressional oversight. i totally expect more defiance.
first, about the defense of michael cohen. they sound a lot like donald trump s own defense. i m not surprised he was doing international business. cohen is in trouble for lying to congress, not anything related to the campaign or russian influence. is that a fair argument, so fear fee a? have you surprised given the president said he had nothing to do with russia? what i am surprised is a senator echoing those sentiments which is inappropriate and something that in his oversight of the senate shouldn t be echoing these types of things. we should be looking at the bottom line to get to the truth and figuring out who is telling the truth and who is not, and i think that s what has to happen. what do you think, don? what do you make of the senator from wyoming there arguing that the president is being a businessman. he s just trying to do international business. is that a fair argument? it s not a fair argument.