should know. there should be a private hearing, a private meeting where we have our elected officials actually hear what actually happened and what the nsa is doing. the bottom line, again, the nsa polices itself. whenever you have a government entity police itself that s a problem. look at irs and tea party. heather: senator patrick leahy, promising a hearing, calling for that. so we ll see if that happens. thank you for joining us angela. thank you, heather. heather: you can now by the way sign up for the hottest fnc stories straight to your in-box every single day. this of course is one of them. visit foxnews.com/foxnewsfirst. simply enter your email into the line. click on the sign-up button and you re good to go. that is foxnews.com/foxnewsfirst. do not miss out. jon: we have the latest on a controversial move by the fed ral government. paying planned parenthood to help people sign up for health care.
data was being collected that spied on americans. that s first. that was false. the administration, they claimed that spying was limited and it was directed overseas. that turns out to be false. yes. heather: and then the president said that the more americans learn about the program the more comfortable they will be. so we ve now found out they re capable of monitoring 75% of internet activity. does that make you more comfortable? no, it doesn t make me comfortable at all. it boils down to the basics of the constitution and probable cause and it is clear that the nsa has colored outside the lines. heather, they even told the court criminally they went outside their bound three times in collecting information. so the problem is this. the government is supposed to protect the consumer but who is policing the nsa? the nsa is policing itself. it has no oversight and it answers to no one but it should answer, heather, to the american
some disinfecting sun slight on a bonafide blunder that it may have been collecting as many as 56,000 domestic and i put the emphasis on domestic communication each and every year. the documents are more revealing for the absolute scolding that the chief judge put on n.s.a. he said for the first time the government has now advised the court that the volume and nature of the information it has been collecting is fundamentally different from what the court had been led to believe. now, the mistake is described as technical in nature. that means that it was grouping together a targeted emails from suspected terrorists with innocent emails because n.s.a. apparently had the inability to separate those emails out. jon: we hear the president is assembling a panel of security experts to review these surveillance procedures? that s the word from abc news. they re reporting that the president has assembled former
what s a chemical weapon? i mean is chlorine in a bottle that burns people s lungs a chemical weapon or does it have to be mustard gas or sarin bass? does it have to be certain concentration, et cetera, et cetera. i think again, the scale of this last incident, if it s a chemical weapons, is so great that it leaves very little room for doubt. jon: well, the opposition says more than 1,000 people are dead and roughly a third of them are children. many of them women as well. just an you have a situation. ambassador adam erli. thank you. thank you. new reaction to the federal government funding of planned parenthood through obamacare. a new report is out showing a nearly a million dollars in grant money is being given to a number of centers nationwide to help sign people up for health insurance under the conversal law. molly henneberg live for us in washington with these details. molly?
people. wasn t it president obama who said that his administration would be about transparency? heather: he absolutely did and, you know, we now have the senate judiciary chairman himself, patrick leahy, he is promising a hearing. we have senator bob corker demanding nsa director, keith alexander brief the entire senate. this as a possible solution. you just touched on it and i want to talk about what you think can be done to provide that oversight. calls for an independent special advocate to oversee the nsa. would that fix things? well, the bottom line is this. we already have things in place, heather. we have the constitution. and we have congress. and again, the government is supposed to protect the consumer. so we re going down a slippery slope here. we should not have an independent advocate. people should be brought to justice if they broke the law. i m for achieving, the war on terror, i m for winning the war