for democrats. (202) 748-8001 for republicans. independents. for if you want to text us, you can do so at (202) 748-8003. post on our twitter feed at c-span wj. mcmanus had aing back that took place yesterday before today s vote, adding it was the house rules committee voting along party lines to send a rule for consideration of the three choi in dollar coronavirus three choi in dollar bill. the rule, $3 trillion bill. it would provide almost $916 and additional funds to testing. it would provide the sweeping measure would provide another round of cash payments to families, housing assistance, medical research funding and the extension of expanded unemployment benefits, tax breaks and more. lowyerspective came from so they can keep their first responders, health-care workers and other public servants paid and working for us. that is in rollcall. if you want to read more of the on thed-forth, it was senate that senators, particularly on the republican side offered crit
surrounding it. where there may be an opportunity to use mohammed, just the fact of having that in the cartoon would overshadow the point i was trying to make and take away from the effectiveness of the cartoon. so it is not that i am not opposed to using mohammed but i am more for ensuring the mess age that i am trying to communicate to the audience. brian: this is a personal question. we will talk about your book. are you really the brother to two sisters that are medical doctors and two brothers as well? michael: i am. and their spouses are as well. we have like nine people that are closely related better all doctors. the only way i can get them to show up at family reunions is i say i deal with politicians and congress, so i am sort like a proctologist. them a sort of let me into the family reunion. brian: go back to this, two sisters and two brothers are medical doctors. and how many of their spouses are? michael: my older brother is a fertility specialist. his wife is n
i think where there may be an opportunity to use mohammed, just the fact of having that in the cartoon would overshadow the point i was trying to make and take away from the effectiveness of the cartoon. so it is not that i am not opposed to using mohammed but i am more for ensuring the message that i am trying to communicate to the audience. gets to the audience. brian: this is a personal question. we will talk about your book. are you really the brother to two sisters that are medical doctors and two brothers as well? michael: i am. and their spouses are as well. we have like nine people that are closely related better all that are all doctors. the only way i can get them to show up at family reunions is i say i deal with politicians and congress, so i am sort like a proctologist. them a sort of let me into the family reunion. brian: go back to this, two sisters and two brothers are medical doctors. and how many of their spouses are? michael: my older brother is a ferti
brian: michael ramirez, have you ever drawn a cartoon of mohammed, and if you have not, would you? michael: you know, i haven t. and i probably would not comment to be honest with you. i don t do controversial cartoons just for the sake of controversy. the point of editorial cartooning is to reach a message to the audience that will not be overshadowed by the controversy surrounding it. where there may be an opportunity to use mohammed, just the fact of having that in the cartoon would overshadow the point i was trying to make and take away from the effectiveness of the cartoon. so it is not that i am not opposed to using mohammed but i am more for ensuring the message that i am trying to communicate to the audience. brian: this is a personal uestion. we will talk about your book. are you really the brother to two sisters that are medical doctors and two brothers as well? michael: i am. and their spouses are as well. we have like nine people that are closely related better al
brian: michael ramirez, have you ever drawn a cartoon of mohammed, and if you have not, would you? michael: you know, i haven t. and i probably would not comment to be honest with you. i don t do controversial cartoons just for the sake of controversy. the point of editorial cartooning is to reach a message to the audience that will not be overshadowed by the controversy surrounding it. where there may be an opportunity to use mohammed, just the fact of having that in the cartoon would overshadow the point i was trying to make and take away from the effectiveness of the cartoon. so it is not that i am not opposed to using mohammed but i am more for ensuring the message that i am trying to communicate gets to the audience. brian: this is a personal question. when i read this, it was the first thing i wanted to ask you about. we will talk about your book. are you really the brother to two sisters that are medical doctors and two brothers as well? michael: i am. and their spouse