Live Breaking News & Updates on Extortion Plot|Page 6
Stay updated with breaking news from Extortion plot. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
(Source: Panasonic) In mid-October, a new post, written in Russian, appeared on a cybercriminal forum. It advertised network access to a large electronics manufacturer, including backups of corporate email and gigabytes of data. The post warned that, if the unnamed company did not pay a $500,000 ransom within seven days, the data would be publicly released. It also said that a ransom note had been sent to the company’s corporate email addresses. The post also offered the data and access to the company’s network to anyone willing to pay $40,000 in the virtual currency bitcoin. “The company is a shareholder and manufacturer of home electronics and electrical equipment,” the forum post said. “At least every five people know this company.” ....
In order to protect the fact they engaged in a cover up of the cut off of aide to ukraine. minute after the phone and wasn t satisfied his extortion plot worked. mulvaney did so. cut off the aide. the evidence is abundant. if he s innocent why is every witness being stone walled. all the evidence and paper work is held back. the question is why are the democrats not going to court or not forcing it for those witnesses who are so important. congress has constitutionally designated powers to the white house. absolute powers. the president a separate branch of government. i have to go. read the constitution. we ll be right back. look, it s just like when i tell people about saving with geico. ....
Question. go ahead, rick. several things obtained here. you have to give rob props for the engages in the version of performative the defenses of donald trump. this is a we didn t do anything wrong. if we did, it wasn t wrong. we did something it s not wrong. we did something wrong so what. that s the argument. we haven t seen more evidence is because the white house is engaged in pattern of obstruction of justice, stone walling. with holding documents and obstruction of justice. they engaged in a cover up of the cut off of aide to ukraine. minute after the phone and wasn t satisfied his extortion plot worked. mulvaney did so. cut off the aide. the evidence is abundant. ....
And two people who have been closely following the impeachment process. msnbc contributor and elizabeth who sat on the house judiciary committee during the watergate impeaches, and author of the case for impeaching trump. you know there s two stories that have been going forward with over the last month or two. there s the story of the whistleblower complaint that became the impeachment inquiry which will likely be the impeachment over the extortion of ukraine and the two intersect. their activities in ukraine and furthering the president s extortion plot are part of what they re indicted for. how much do you see these two roads crossing? extensively given these two men were essentially acting as intermediaries between rudy giuliani and the president. ....
Losing to russia, losing in the battlefield, being injured or killed. so that s the stakes of why the extortion plot was so strong. and donald trump is someone who is often underestimated. i think by now, americans have learned not to underestimate his sense of how to find people s weakness and exploit it. now, in strategy and politics and business, that can be legal up to a line. in other ways, it has been alleged as potentially over the line. but that s what this is about. donald trump s not an expert on the appropriations process or on the names of ambassadors. he doesn t claim to be. he certainly figured out there was a pressure point of weakness here, as you as you state and as these witnesses as we watch the room fill, as these witnesses will further testify in detail and he exploited that. that s number one. number two, just to build on mr. weissman s legal analysis, the o.j. version of this is, if you didn t kill her, who did? right? that s the question about the money. somet ....